Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Radiologische Diagnostik von Lebertumoren

Teil II: Nachweis und Differenzialdiagnose

Radiological diagnosis of hepatic tumors

Part II: Identification and differential diagnosis

  • CME Weiterbildung • Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Radiologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Fokale Leberläsionen finden sich bei 5% der Gesamtbevölkerung. Da onkologische Erkrankungen hinsichtlich der Morbidität und der Mortalität der Bevölkerung eine wichtige Rolle spielen, kommt der Abklärung solch häufiger Befunde eine große Bedeutung zu. Nachdem im ersten Teil der Übersichtsdarstellung die auch für Radiologen wichtigsten Aspekte in der Klassifikation, Epidemiologie und Pathologie von Lebertumoren vermittelt und der aktuelle technische Stand der diagnostischen Verfahren erläutert wurden, beschäftigt sich der vorliegende zweite Teilbeitrag damit, die radiologischen Verfahren in ihrer Bedeutung für den Nachweis und die Differenzialdiagnose von Lebertumoren zu bewerten.

Abstract

Focal hepatic lesions occur in 5% of the population. The clarification of such common occurrences is of major significance because oncological diseases play an important role with respect to morbidity and mortality of the population. The first part of this review article dealt with the most important aspects of classification, epidemiology and pathology of hepatic tumors for radiologists and the current technical situation with regards to the diagnostic procedure. This second part of the review deals with the significance of radiological procedures for identification and differential diagnosis of hepatic tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8

Literatur

  1. Bartolozzi C, Donati F, Cioni D et al. (2004) Detection of colorectal liver metastases: a prospective multicenter trial comparing unenhanced MRI, MnDPDP-enhanced MRI, and spiral CT. Eur Radiol 14: 14–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhartia B, Ward J, Guthrie JA et al. (2003) Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic livers: double-contrast thin-section MRI with pathologic correlation of explanted tissue. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180: 577–584

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bipat S, Van Leeuwen MS, Comans EF et al. (2005) Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis – meta-analysis. Radiology 237: 123–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buetow PC, Pantongrag-Brown L, Buck JL et al. (1996) Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 16: 369–388

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Colli A, Fraquelli M, Casazza G et al. (2006) Accuracy of ultrasonography, spiral CT, magnetic resonance, and alpha-fetoprotein in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 101: 513–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. De Lange EE, Mugler JP, Gay SB et al. (1996) Focal liver disease: comparison of breath-hold T1-weighted MP-GRE MR imaging and contrast-enhanced CT – lesion detection, localization, and characterization. Radiology 200: 465–473

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dietrich CF, Kratzer W, Strobe D et al. (2006) Assessment of metastatic liver disease in patients with primary extrahepatic tumors by contrast-enhanced sonography versus CT and MRI. World J Gastroenterol 12: 1699–1705

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferlicot S, Kobeiter H, Van Nhieu JT et al. (2004) MRI of atypical focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: radiology-pathology correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182: 1227–1231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grazioli L, Morana G, Kirchin MA et al. (2005) Accurate differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatic adenoma at gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging: prospective study. Radiology 236: 166–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hagspiel KD, Neidl KFW, Eichenberger AC et al. (1995) Detection of liver metastases: comparison of supermagnatic iron oxide-enhanced and unenhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T with dynamic CT, intraoperative US, and percutaneous US. Radiology 196: 471–478

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Helmberger H, Bautz W, Vogel U et al. (1993) CT-Arterioportographie in Spiraltechnik zum Nachweis von Lebermetastasen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 158: 410–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huppertz A, Balzer T, Blakeborough A et al. (2004) Improved detection of focal liver lesions at MRI: multicenter comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images with intraoperative findings. Radiology 230: 266–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hussain SM, Van den Boos IC, Dwarkasing RS et al. (2006) Hepatocellular adenoma: findings at state-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, computed tomography and pathologic analysis. Eur Radiol 16: 1873–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Irie T, Takeshita K, Wada Y et al. (1995) CT evaluation of hepatic tumors: comparison of CT wirth arterial portography, CT with infusion hepatic arteriography, and simultaneous of both techniques. Am J Roentgenol 164: 1407–1412

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawamori Y, Matsui O, Takahashi S et al. (1996) Focal hepatic fatty infiltration in the posterior edge of the medial segment associated with aberrant gastric venous drainage: CT, US, and MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20: 356–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim KW, Kim AY, Kim TK et al. (2004) Small (<2 cm) hepatic lesions in colorectal cancer patients: detection and characterization on Mangafodipir Trisodium-enhanced MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182: 1233–1240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim YK, Kim CS, Lee YH et al. (2004) Comparison of superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced and gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced dynamic MRI for detection of small hepatocellular carcinomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182: 1217–1223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim YK, Kim CS, Chung GH et al. (2006) Comparison of gadobenate diglumine-enhanced dynamic MRI and 16-MDCT for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186: 149–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim YK, Kwak HS, Kim CS et al. (2006) Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: comparison of SPIO-enhanced MR imaging and 16-detector row CT. Radiology 238: 531–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kinkel K, Lu Y, Both M et al. (2002) Detection of hepatic metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract by using noninvasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis. Radiology 224: 748–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kreft B, Wolff M, Layer G et al. (1995) Bildgebende Diagnostik beim primären hepatobiliären Zystadenom der Leber. Aktuelle Radiol 5: 19–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Layer G, Runge I, Conrad R et al. (1999) Portal kontrastverstärkte Spiral-Computertomographie der Leber – Korrelation radiologischer und intraoperativer Befunde und Beurteilung der Resektabilität. Fortschr Röntgenstr 171: 455–460

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee HM, Lu DS, Krasny RM et al. (1997) Hepatic lesion characterization in cirrhosis: significance of arterial hypervascularity on dual-phase helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 169: 125–130

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Onishi H, Murakami T, Kim T et al. (2006) Hepatic metastases: detection with multi-detector row CT, SPIO-enhanced MR imaging, and both techniques combined. Radiology 239: 131–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pauleit D, Textor J, Bachmann R et al. (2002) Hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with gadolinium- and ferrumoxides-enhanced MR imaging of the liver. Radiology 222: 73–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sahani Sahani D, Kalva SP, Tanabe KK et al. (2004) Intraoperative US in patients undergoing surgery for liver neoplasms: comparison with MR imaging. Radiology 232: 810–814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Seneterre E, Taourel P, Bouvier Y et al. (1996) Detection of hepatic metastases: ferrumoxides-enhanced MR imaging versus unenhanced MR imaging and CT during arterial portography. Radiology 200: 785–792

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Spreafico C, Marchiano A, Mazzaferro V et al. (1997) Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients who undergo liver transplantation: sensitivity of CT with iodized oil. Radiology 203: 457–460

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tang Y, Yamashita Y, Arakawa A et al. (1999) Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma arising in cirrhotic livers: comparison of gadolinium- and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172: 1547–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Urhahn R, Adam G, Keulers P et al. (1996) Erkennbarkeit fokaler Leberläsionen: Vergleich von MRT bei 1,5 T und dynamischer Spiral-CT. Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 164: 301–307

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Valls C, Cos M, Figueras J et al. (2004) Pretransplantation diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Value of dual-phase helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182: 1011–1017

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ward J, Robinson PJ, Guthrie JA et al. (2005) Liver metastases in candidates for hepatic resection: comparison of helical CT and gadolinium- and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 237: 170–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yamamoto H, Yamashita Y, Yoshimatsu S et al. (1995) Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic livers: detection with unenhanced and iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 195: 106–112

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Youk JH, Kim CS, Lee JMJ (2003) Contrast-enhanced agent detection imaging: value in the characterization of focal hepatic lesions. Ultrasound Med 22: 897–910

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zentralinstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen gGmbH, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Bremserstraße 79, 67063, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland

    G. Layer

  2. E010 – Radiologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Deutschland

    S. Delorme

Authors
  1. G. Layer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Delorme
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Layer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Layer, G., Delorme, S. Radiologische Diagnostik von Lebertumoren. Radiologe 47, 919–934 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-007-1564-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-007-1564-y

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation