Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the declustering methods of seismic catalogue — an application over Indian subcontinent

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seismic catalogue preparation is one of the important steps of probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA). Catalogue preparation includes homogenization and declustering as the main stem of pre-processing followed by a completeness check to arrive at the recurrence relation. Homogenization is the process of converting the events reported with different magnitude scales into a uniform scale whereas declustering is the process of removing dependent events, i.e. foreshocks and aftershocks from an earthquake catalogue. Accepting the subjectivity involved in the adopted process of homogenization and completeness check, the selection of declustering method apparently results in significantly different declustered catalogues owing to the variation in respective spatial and temporal interaction zones. This paper is aimed to investigate sensitivity of the selection of declustering method on the resulting recurrence relations. Indian catalogue (2474 BC to July 2020 AD) and that in three smaller regions (Delhi, North-East, and Andaman) of 300-km radius are considered for the purpose of investigation. Standard approach is used for homogenization. Two widely used procedures of declustering are considered: one requires a set of specific model parameters whereas the other does not. A uniform space–time window is recommended to be used with the former regardless of the selection of model parameters followed by Stepp’s method for the completeness check. Proposed modification does not only make the former approach less sensitive (in terms of number of events and resulting recurrence relation parameters) to the model parameters but also leads to the consistent results when compared with the latter approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data from different sources declared in the Acknowledgement are publicly available.

ISC (http://www.isc.ac.uk/iscbulletin/search/catalogue/)

USGS (https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/search/)

NCS (https://riseq.seismo.gov.in/riseq/earthquake/archive)

IRIS DMC (https://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/data/types/events/catalogs/).

References

  • Ader TJ, Avouac JP (2013) Detecting periodicities and declustering in earthquake catalogs using the Schuster spectrum, application to Himalayan seismicity. Earth Planet Sci Lett 377–378:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam E, Dominey-Howes D (2016) A catalogue of earthquakes between 810BC and 2012 for the Bay of Bengal. Nat Hazards 81:2031–2102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys N. and Bilham R., (2009). The tectonic setting of Bamiyan and seismicity in and near Afghanistan for the past twelve centuries. UNESCO Special Publication: The Destruction of the Giant Buddha Statues in Bamiyan, Central Afghanistan, UNESCO’s emergency activities for the recovering and rehabilitation of cliff and niches. Ed. Claudio Margottini, ISBN 978–448–0375–5. 158 p.

  • Ambraseys N, Jackson D (2003) A note on early earthquakes in northern India and southern Tibet. Curr Sci 84:570–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Ameer AS, Sharma ML, Wason HR, Alsinawi SA (2005) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Iraq using complete earthquake catalogue files. Pure Appld Geophys 162(5):951–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbazhagan P, Bajaj K, Matharu K, Moustafa SSR, Al-Arifi NSN (2019) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis using the logic tree approach – Patna district (India). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 19:2097–2115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbazhagan P, Smitha CV, Kumar A, Chandran D (2013) Estimation of design basis earthquake using region-specific Mmax, for the NPP site at Kalpakkam, Tamil Nadu, India. Nucl Eng Des 259:41–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbazhagan P, Vinod JS, Sitharam TG (2009) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Bangalore. Nat Hazards 48:145–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakun WH (1984) Seismic moments, local magnitudes and coda-duration magnitudes for earthquakes in central California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74:439–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bapat A., Kulkarni R. C. and Guha, S. K., (1983). Catalogue of earthquakes in India and Neighborhood from historical period up to 1799. Indian Society of Earthquakes Technology, pp. 211.

  • Bashir A, Basu D (2018) Revisiting probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Gujarat: an assessment of Indian design spectra. Nat Hazards 91(3):1127–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Joyner WB (1982) The empirical prediction of ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:S43–S60

    Google Scholar 

  • Bora DK (2016) Scaling relations of moment magnitude, local magnitude, and duration magnitude for earthquakes originated in northeast India. Earthq Sci 29:153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunmiller J, Deichmann N, Giardini D, Wiemer S, SED Magnitude Working Group (2005) Homogeneous moment-magnitude calibration in Switzerland. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 95(1):58–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra U (1977) Earthquakes of Peninsular India - a seismotectonic study Bull. Seismol Soc Am 67(5):1387–1413

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra U (1978) Seismicity, earthquake mechanisms and tectonics along the Himalayan mountain range and vicinity. Phys Earth Planet Inter 16:109–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra U (1992) Seismotectonics of Himalaya. Curr Sci 62(1–2):40–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen WP, Molnar P (1990) Source parameters of earthquakes and intraplate deformation beneath the Shillong Plateau and northern Indoburman Ranges. J Geophys Res 95:12527–12552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das R, Wason HR, Sharma ML (2012) Temporal and spatial variations in the magnitude of completeness for homogenized moment magnitude catalogue for northeast India. J Earth Syst Sci 121:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangrade B. K., Prasad A. G. V. and Sharma R. D., (1987a). Earthquakes from peninsular India: data from the Gauribidanur seismic array. BARC Publ. No. BARC -1347.

  • Gangrade B. K., Prasad A. G. V., Kumar Manoj, Unnikrishnan E. and Nagaraja C., (2012). Seismicity of Peninsular India and earthquake catalogue based on Gauribidanur Seismic Array Data. BARC Publ. No. BARC/2012/E/005.

  • Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull Seis Soc Am 64(5):1363–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guha S. K. and Basu, (1993). Catalogue of earthquakes (> 3.0) in Peninsular India. AERB Technical Document No. TD/CSE -1, pp. 1- 70.

  • Gupta I. D. and Joshi R. G., (2001). Probabilistic seismic zoning of Maharashtra State, workshop on Western India with special reference to recent Kutch earthquake CDAC Pune 14 July 2001, Paper No. 1, 16 pp. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4673.7767.

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seism Soc Am 34:185–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1949) Seismicity of the earth and associated phenomena. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B. and Richter C. F., (1956). Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy and acceleration (second paper). Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer. (in press) pp. 105–145.

  • Iyengar RN, Sharma D, Siddiqui JM (1999) Earthquake history of India in medieval times. Indian Journal of history Science 34:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal K, Sinha R (2007) Probabilistic seismic-hazard estimation for Peninsular India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:318–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H, Anderson DL (1975) Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65:1073–1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayal JR, Arefiev SS, Saurabh B, Hazarika D, Gogoi N, GautamSantanuDorbathTatevossian JbLBCR (2012) Large and great earthquakes in the Shillong plateau–Assam valley area of Northeast India Region: pop-up and transverse tectonics. Tectonophysics 532–535:186–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan A. K. and Ghosh G. K., (2007). Statistical analysis of completeness of earthquake data of Northwest Himalayan region and its implication for seismicity evaluation. In: Varma, O.P., Mahajan, A.K., Gupta, V. (Eds.), Natural hazard: proceeding of the National Conference on “Natural Hazards (earthquakes and land slides): challenges, perspectives and societal dimensions with focus on the state of Uttaranchal”, Dehradun, December 26–28, 2003, pp.45–56.

  • Martin S, Szeliga W (2010) A catalog of felt intensity data for 570 earthquakes in India from 1636 to 2009. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:562–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon A, Ornthammarath T, Corigliano M, Lai CG (2010) Probabilistic seismic hazard macrozonation of Tamil Nadu in Southern India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:1320–1341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne J., (1911). A catalogue of destructive earthquakes: A.D. 7 to A.D. 1899, British Association for the Advancement of Science London, 92 p.

  • Mogi K (1962) On the time distribution of aftershocks accompanying the recent major earthquakes in and near Japan. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo 40(107–124):1962

    Google Scholar 

  • Molchan GM, Dmitrieva OE (1992) Aftershock identification: methods and new approaches. Geophys J Int 109:501–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay B, Dasgupta S (2015) Seismic hazard assessment of Kashmir and Kangra valley region, Western Himalaya, India. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 6:149–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthuganeisan P, Raghukanth STG (2016) Site-specific probabilistic seismic hazard map of Himachal Pradesh, India. Part II Hazard Estimation Acta Geophys 64:853–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath SK, Mandal S, Das AM, Maiti SK (2017) A unified earthquake catalogue for South Asia covering the period 1900–2014. Nat Hazards 85:1787–1810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NDMA, (2010). Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of India. National Disaster Management Authority, India, New Delhi.

  • Oldham T., (1883). A catalogue of Indian earthquakes from the earliest times to the end of 1869 A.D. Mem. Geol. Surv. India. XIX, Part. 3.

  • Pandey AK, Chingtham P, Roy PNS (2017) Homogeneous earthquake catalogue for Northeast region of India using robust statistical approaches. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 8:1477–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisarenko VF, Rodkin MV (2019) Declustering of seismicity flow: statistical analysis. Izv. Phys Solid Earth 55:733–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quittmeyer RC, Jacob KH (1979) Historical and modern seismicity of Pakistan, Afghanistan, north-western India and south-eastern Iran. Bull Seismol Soc Am 69:773–823

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghukanth STG (2011) Seismicity parameters for important urban agglomerations in India. Bull Earthq Eng 9:1361–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao BR (2000) Historical seismicity and deformation rates in the Indian Peninsular Shield. J Seismol 4:247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao BR, Rao PS (1984) Historical seismicity of peninsular India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74(6):2519–2533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reasenberg P (1985) Second-order moment of central California seismicity, 1969–1982. J Geophys Res 90:5479–5495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santanu B, Saurabh B, Saikia S, Shrivastava MN, Sharma A, Reddy CD, Kayal JR (2016) State of tectonic stress in Shillong Plateau of northeast India. Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 95:36–49

  • Singh SK, Rodríguez M, Espindola JM (1984) A catalog of shallow earthquakes of Mexico from 1900 to 1981. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 74(1):267–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitharam TG, Sil A (2014) Comprehensive seismic hazard assessment of Tripura and Mizoram states. J Earth Syst Sci 123:837–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava HN, Ramachandran K (1985) New catalogue of earthquakes for Peninsular India during 1839–1900. Meteorol Off, New Delhi, Mausam 36(3):351–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepp JC (1972) Analysis of completeness of the earthquake sample in the Puget Sound area and its effect on statistical estimates of earthquake hazard. In Proc 1st Int Conf Microzonazion. Seattle 2:897–910

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner HH (1911) Seismological investigations XII, seismic activity, 1899–1903 inclusive. Br Assoc Adv Sci, London, pp 57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhrhammer R (1986) Characteristics of Northern and Central California seismicity. Earthq Notes 57(1):21

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Stiphout T., J. Zhuang and D. Marsan, (2012). Seismicity declustering, Community Online Resource for Statistical Seismicity Analysishttps://doi.org/10.5078/corssa-52382934

  • Weatherill GA, Pagani M, Garcia J (2016) Exploring earthquake databases for the creation of magnitude-homogeneous catalogues: tools for application on a regional and global scale. Geophys J Int 206:1652–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer S (2001) A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP. Seismol Res Lett 72(3):373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly acknowledge the sources of seismic catalogues used in this study: International Seismological Centre, UK; US Geological Survey; National Center for Seismology, India; and IRIS Data Management Centre, New York.

Funding

This research is funded by the Ministry of Earth Sciences, Seismology Division, Government of India, under the Grant No. MoES/P.O.(Seismo)/1(370)/2019 and the financial support is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar, India

    Narsiram Gurjar & Dhiman Basu

Authors
  1. Narsiram Gurjar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dhiman Basu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DB proposed the idea, prepared the final draft, acquired the funding, and managed the overall research. NG processed the data, analysed, generated results, and prepared the first draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhiman Basu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 334 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gurjar, N., Basu, D. On the declustering methods of seismic catalogue — an application over Indian subcontinent. J Seismol 26, 1077–1103 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-022-10105-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-022-10105-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation