Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Grundlagen in Kommunikation und Beeinflussung

  • Chapter
Konsumentenpsychologie und Markenartikel

Zusammenfassung

Wer Marketing betreibt, versucht systematisch andere Personen durch gezielte Kommunikationen zu beeinflussen. Die Steuerung des Verhaltens von Personen erfolgt nicht nur durch Werbung für jegliche Produkte und/oder Dienstleistungen. Viele Institutionen betreiben (Massen-) Kommunikation mit dem gleichen Ziel: Schulen, Universitäten, Parteien, Regierungen, Kirchen, Behörden, Demagogen und andere Institutionen mehr. Entsprechend groß war schon immer das Interesse daran, mögliche Gesetzesmäßigkeiten zu finden. Daher ist die Suche nach Gesetzen in der Marktkommunikation, deren Einhaltung entweder Voraussetzung für die Wirksamkeit dieser Kommunikation ist oder der Optimierung der gewünschten Effekte derartiger Aktivitäten förderlich sein kann, einer der zentralen Aspekte in der Marketing-Forschung und -Praxis. Für die Praxis angestrebt werden allgemein verwendbare Grundregeln. Diese wären nichts anderes als in die Praxis transferierte Theorien, welche, wenn sie für alle Kommunikationsprobleme in allen Situationen in Raum und Zeit gleichermaßen Gültigkeit hätten (das ist die wesentliche, zentrale Anforderung an „allgemein-gültige Grundregeln“), Theorien mit maximalem Geltungsbereich wären. Wir hätten dann sog. „Immer-und-überall-wenn-dann-Aussagen“ vor uns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Abelson R P and Lesser G S (1959) The Measurement of Persuasibility in Children. In I L Janis, C I Hovland et al, Personality and Persuasibility. New Haven: 141–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Allyn J and Festinger L (1961) The Effectiveness of Unanticipated Persuasive Communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson E and Golden B W (1962)The Effect of Relevant and Irrelevant Aspects of Communicator Credibility on Opinion Change. Journal of Personality, 30,135–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson E, Turner J A and Carlsmith J M (1963) Communication Credibility and Communication Discrepancy as Determinants of Opinion Change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton B(1980) Das Betrachren von Anzeigen. In Interview und AAnalyse, 7.,254–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck K H and Frankel A (1981) A Conceptualization of Threat Communications and Protective Health Behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 204–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz L (Ed.) (1964, 1967, 1970 ) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. I, III, V. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm J W (1966) A Theory of Psychological Reactance, New York, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Capon N and Hulbert J (1973) The Sleeper Effect–An Awakening. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 333–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken S and Eagly A H (1976) Communication Modality as a Determinand of Message Persuasiveness and Message Comprehensibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 605–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A R (1957) Need for Cogition and Order of Communications as Determinants of Opinion Change. In C I Hovland, W Mandell, E H Campbell et al. The order of Presentation in Persuasion. New Haven: 79–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A R (1959) Some Implications of S elf-Esteem for Social Influence. In I L Janis, C L Hovland et al, Personality and Persuasibility. New Haven: 102–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A R (1964) Attitude Change and Social Influence. New York, London

    Google Scholar 

  • v. Cranach M, Irle M und Vetter M (1965) zur Analyse des Bumerang-Effektes, Größe und Richtung der Änderung sozialer Einstellungen als Funktion ihrer Verankerung in Wertsystemen. Psychologische Forschung, 28, 535–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly A H (1978) Sex Differences in Influenceability. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 86–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly A H and Carli L L (1981) Sex of Researchers and Sex-Typed Communications as Determi-

    Google Scholar 

  • nants of Sex Differences in Influenceability: A Meta-Analyses of Social Influence Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psychological Bulletin, 90,1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly A H and Warren R (1976) Intelligence, Comprehension, and Opinion Change. Journal of Personality, 44, 225–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly A H, Wood W and Fishbaugh L (1981) Sex Differences in Conformity: Surveillance by the Group as a Determinant of Male Nonconformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 384–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Etgar M and Goodwin S A (1982) One-Sided versus Two-Sided Comparative Message Appeals for New Brand Introductions. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 460–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faison E W J (1961) Experimental Comparison of the Efectiveness of One-Sided and Two-Sided Mass Communications on the Influence of Economic Attitudes. Paper presented at the Meeting of the American Association of Public Opinion Research, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger L and Maccoby N (1964) On Resistance to Persuasive Communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger L (1954) A Theory of Social Comparison Processes Human Relations, 7, 117–140 Frey D (1979) Einstellungsforschung: Neuere Ergebnisse der Forschung über Einstellungsänderungen. Marketing, ZFP, 1, 31–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson L D (1983) Not Recall. Journal of Advertising Research, 23, No. 1, 39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Giffin K (1967) The Contribution of Studies of Source Credibility to a Theory of Interpersonal Trust in the Communication Process. Psychological Bulletin, 68, No. 2, 104–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillig P M and Greenwald A G (1974) Is it Time to Lay the Sleeeper Effekt to Rest? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 132–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabitz H J and Haisch J (1982) Subjective Hypotheses in Diagnosis Problems. In M. Irle (Ed.) Studies in Decision Making. Social Psychological and Socio-Economic Analyses. Berlin, New York: 235–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaland G A and Venkatesan M (1968) Resistance to Persuasive Communications: An Examina- tion of the Distraction Hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9,167–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haley R I, Richardson J and Baldwin B M (1984) The Effects of Nonverbal Communications in Television Advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 24, No. 4,11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon R R and Coney K A (1982) The Persuasive Effects of Source Credibility in Buy and Lease Situations. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heesacker M, Petty R E and Cacioppo J T (1983) Field Dependence and Attitude Change: Source Credibility Can Alter Persuasion by Affecting Message-Relevant Thinking. Journal of Personality, 51, 653–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland C I and Janis I L (1959) Summery and Implications for Future Research. In I. L. Janis, C. I. Hovland et al, Personality and Persuasibility. New Haven: 225–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland C I, Janis I L and Kelley H H (1953) Communication and Persuasion. Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland C I, Lumsdaine A A and Sheffield F D (1949) Experiments on Mass Communication. Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland C I and Mandell W (1952) An Experimental Comparison of Conclusion-Drawing by the Communicator and by the Audience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 581–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovland C I, Mandell W and Campbell E H et al (1957) The Order of Presentation in Persuasion. New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland C I and Weiss W (1951) The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irle M (Hrsg.) (1973) Texte aus der experimentellen Sozialpsychologie. Darmstadt, Neuwied

    Google Scholar 

  • Irle M (1975) Lehrbuch der Sozialpsychologie. Göttingen, Toronto, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Irle M (1978) Theorie, empirische Forschung und Praxis in der Sozialpsychlogie. In ders. (Hrsg.), Kursus der Sozialpsychologie. Darmstadt, Neuwied: 15–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Irle M (Hrsg.) (1978) Kursus der Sozialpsychologie. Darmstadt, Neuwied

    Google Scholar 

  • Irle M (Ed.) (1982) Studies in Decision Making. Social Psychological and Socio-EconomicAnalyses. Berlin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Irle M (Ed.) (1982) Studies in Decision Making. Social Psychological and Socio-EconomicAnalyses. Berlin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Irle M (Hrsg.) (1983) Marktpsychologie, 1. Halbb. Göttingen, Toronto, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis I L (1967) Effects of Fear Arousal on Attitude Change. Recent Developments in Theory and Experimental Research. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 3. New York: 166–224

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Janis I L and Feschbach S (1953) Effects of Fear-Arousing Communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 78–92. (dt. in M Irle, Hrsg., Texte aus der experimentellen Sozialpsychologie, Neuwied, Darmstadt: 1973, 224–257 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis I L and Field P B (1959) A Behavioral Assessment of Persuasibility: Consistency of Individual Differences. In Janis I L, Hovland C I et al, Personality and Persuasibility. New Haven: 29–54, (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis I L and Field P B (1959) Sex Differences and Personality Factors Related to Persuasibility. In Janis I L, Hovland C I et al, Personality and Persuasibility. New Haven: 55–68, (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis I L, Hovland C I et al (1959) Personality and Persuasibility. New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson H H and Scileppi J A (1969) Effects of Ego-Involvement Conditions on Attitude Change to High and Low Credibility Communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer J N and Laurent G (1985/1986) Consumer Involvement Profiles: An New Practical Approach to Consumer Involvement. Journal of Advertising Research, 25, No. 6, 48–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman H C and Hovland C I (1953) „Reinstatement“ of the Communicator in Delayed Measure-ment of Opinion Change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 327–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler C A and Kiesler S B (1964) Role of Forewarning in Persuasive Communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 547–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P (1982) Marketing-Management, Analyse, Planung und Kontrolle (4. Aufl.), Stuttgart Kroeber-Riel W. (1984) Konsumentenverhalten ( 3. Aufl. ), München

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal H (1970) Findings and Theory in the Study of Fear Communications. In L Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 5. New York: 119–186

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lindzey G and Aronson E (Eds.) (1985) Handbock of Social Psychology, Vol. II, (3rd Ed.) New York ( 2nd Ed. Reading: 1969, Vol. III )

    Google Scholar 

  • Luchins A S (1957) Primacy-Recency in Impression Formation. In C I Hovland, W Mandell, E H Campbell et al, The Order of Presentation in Persuasion. New Haven: 33–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden T J and Weinberger M G (1984) Humor in Advertising: A Practitioner View. Journal of Advertising Research, 24, No. 4, 23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Mähling F W (1983) Manipulation des Konsumenten durch suggestive Werbung? Markenartikel, 53, 8–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Guire W J (1964) Inducing Resistance to Persuasion, Some Contemporary Approaches. In L Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 1. New York, 191–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Guire W J (1985) Attitudes and Attitude Change. In G Lindzey, E Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. II, (3rd. Ed.). New York, 233–346, (2nd Ed. Reading: 1969,136–314, Vol. I II )

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Guire W J and Papageorgis D (1962) The Effect of Forewarning in Developing Resistance to Persuasion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 24–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen B (1984) Social Psychological Models of Impression Formation Among Consumers. The Journal of Socuial Psychology, 124, First half, 65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson D, Schlinger M J and Young C (1982) How Consumer React to New-Product Ads. Journal of Advertising Research, 22, No. 3, 24–30

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Quin K and Aronoff J (1981) Humor as a Technique of Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 349–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K R (1979) Die beiden Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie. Tübingen Popper K R (1982) Logik der Forschung ( 7. Aufl. ). Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson T S, Zielinski J, and Ward S (1984) Consumer Behavior. Glenview

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers R W (1975) A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change. Journal of Psychology, 91, 93–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • v. Rosenstiel L und Ewald G (1979) Marktpsychologie. Bd. I I, Psychologie der absatzpolitischen Instrumente. Stuttgart, Berlin, Köln, Mainz

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon C and Weaver W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana Sherif M and Hovland C I ( 1961 ) Social Judgement. New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif C W, Sherif M and Nebergall R E (1965) Attitude and Attitude Change. The Social Judgement-Involvement Approach. Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons H W, Berkowitz N N and Moyer R J (1970) Similitary, Credibility, and Attitude Change: A Review and a Theory. Psychological Bulletin, 73, No. 1, 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternthal B and Craig S (1973) Humor in Advertising. Journal of Marketing, 37, No. 4, 12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum P H (1967) The Congruity Principle Revisited: Studies in the Reduction, Induction, and Generalization of Persuasion. In L Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 3. New York, 271–320

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis H C (1975) Einstellungen und Einstellungsänderungen. Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger F (1983) Public Relations im Kommunikations-Mix. Markenartikel, 45, 351–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Upmeyer A (1985) Soziale Urteilsbildung. Stuttgart, Berlin, Köln, Mainz

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan M and Haaland G A (1968) Divided Attention and Television Commercials: An Experimental Study. Journal of Marketing Research, 5, 203–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walster E, Aronson E and Abrahams D (1966) On Increasing the Persuasiveness of a Low Prestige Communicator. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 325–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walster E and Festinger L (1962) Teh Effectiveness of „Overheard“ Persuasive Communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc R B (1968) Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo P G, Ebbesen E B and Maslach C (1977) Influencing Attitudes and Changing Behavior. Reading

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Fritz Unger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fachbereich 2, Wirtschaftsingenieurwesen der Fachhochschule für Druck Stuttgart, Nobelstraße 10, 7000, Stuttgart 80, Weinheim, Deutschland

    Fritz Unger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Unger, F. (1986). Grundlagen in Kommunikation und Beeinflussung. In: Unger, F. (eds) Konsumentenpsychologie und Markenartikel. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93621-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93621-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-93622-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-93621-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation