Shimano FC500 crankset
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Shimano FC500 crankset
I've searched for info on this crankset but can't find anything. It's a 28/38/48 FC500 from my '97 Fisher Nirvana. It's nothing special, but I'm wondering if it's possible to fit it with a smaller inner chainring. I asked at one shop and they said no, but thought I'd hunt around some more. Thanks!
#2
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
From the looks of it, you may be able to go a little smaller, but not much. Measure the center-to-center distance between bolt holes, multiply by 1.7 to get the "BCD": https://sheldonbrown.com/harris/chainrings.html
#3
Senior Member
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Vuelta-Chain...item3389db0a97
This might work for you, you need to find out the BCD for that crankset. Here is a link to help you out.
https://sheldonbrown.com/gloss_bo-z.html
This might work for you, you need to find out the BCD for that crankset. Here is a link to help you out.
https://sheldonbrown.com/gloss_bo-z.html
#4
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,649
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,704 Times
in
937 Posts
It looks like you should be able to find a 24 or even a 22 tooth chainring in 74. That's pretty tiny.
What are you running for your big rings in the back? I think it would be less hassle to do a different cassette.
28 x 28 is pretty spinny unless you've got some monsterous hills and you're pulling a lot of weight.
What are you running for your big rings in the back? I think it would be less hassle to do a different cassette.
28 x 28 is pretty spinny unless you've got some monsterous hills and you're pulling a lot of weight.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#5
Senior Member
That looks like the rings are all pressed together so I don't think you can swap out the inner ring by itself.
#6
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,649
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,704 Times
in
937 Posts
Ewww...
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#7
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 27,868
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2938 Post(s)
Liked 2,934 Times
in
1,497 Posts
That is what I am wondering, they look more like hollow rivets than hex bolts but a better pic will tell.
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
#8
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,194
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,296 Times
in
866 Posts
That crankset is good for what it is, so I would say love it or leave it!
I'm puzzled that it's a "500"-level crankset. To my eye, it looks like TY- or maybe 3XX-series.
My 500CX (FC-M500) cranks are 30-40-50t with removable 110/74bcd alloy SG rings. Shown here:
I'm puzzled that it's a "500"-level crankset. To my eye, it looks like TY- or maybe 3XX-series.
My 500CX (FC-M500) cranks are 30-40-50t with removable 110/74bcd alloy SG rings. Shown here:
#9
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I found some old documentation from Fisher that says this crankset has 74/110mm bolt circle diameter. But only the smallest chainring looks to be bolted on, the middle one appears to be attached to the outer ring in some other way. The face of that smallest chainring also has a ridge on it to provide spacing between it and the middle ring. It's not just a flat ring.
Yeah, changing out the cassette might be easier, but I just want to know if changing that inner ring is even an option. I rarely use the inner ring, but there have been some steep rides where I wished for a lower gear. My current cassette is an 12-28. Thanks!
Yeah, changing out the cassette might be easier, but I just want to know if changing that inner ring is even an option. I rarely use the inner ring, but there have been some steep rides where I wished for a lower gear. My current cassette is an 12-28. Thanks!
Last edited by mowyang; 01-20-14 at 02:40 PM.
#10
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,194
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,296 Times
in
866 Posts
I have bought a few of the 7sp, 13-34t cassettes over the years. It's not one of those megarange types with just one huge cog tacked on.
And SRAM sells a 12-32t 7sp I believe, that is also very inexpensive.
And SRAM sells a 12-32t 7sp I believe, that is also very inexpensive.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,243
Bikes: Specialized Sequoia Elite/Motobecane Fantom Cross Team Ti/'85 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Can you please take a picture of the other side of the crankset? It looks like a standard Shimano crankset that can go down to the 22-24t chainrings.
The other side is what matters.
The other side is what matters.
#13
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,194
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,296 Times
in
866 Posts
Those two small holes either side of the chainring bolts look like crimping or spot welds to me.
I'd guess that it would be hard to remove the small ring without damaging the larger ones that it's attached to.
A grinder might easily take it off, and then you'll need the new chainring and an appropriate set of spacers.
That bolt pattern won't accept anything smaller than 24t, I'm sure of that.
I'd guess that it would be hard to remove the small ring without damaging the larger ones that it's attached to.
A grinder might easily take it off, and then you'll need the new chainring and an appropriate set of spacers.
That bolt pattern won't accept anything smaller than 24t, I'm sure of that.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,243
Bikes: Specialized Sequoia Elite/Motobecane Fantom Cross Team Ti/'85 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Very interesting. I have never seen a Shimano crankset like that even in our pile of random cranksets at my co-op.
I have seen crimped cheap cranksets setup like yours where there is only 1 set of chainring rivets but never on somewhat decent triple cranksets with removable chainring bolts. Your set with the steel chainrings (they look like typical steel stamped rings but I maybe wrong) look like somewhat entry level quality. I wonder though if someone had drilled out rivets and replaced them with chainring bolts?
I doubt that you will find a smaller chainring easily considering the oddness of the crankset.
Usually on Shimano triples, you find the outer chainring nuts and bolts which are exposed to the outside of the crankarm and then there is another set of chainring bolts that hold the small chainring in place and are hidden by the backside of the crankarm.
I have seen crimped cheap cranksets setup like yours where there is only 1 set of chainring rivets but never on somewhat decent triple cranksets with removable chainring bolts. Your set with the steel chainrings (they look like typical steel stamped rings but I maybe wrong) look like somewhat entry level quality. I wonder though if someone had drilled out rivets and replaced them with chainring bolts?
I doubt that you will find a smaller chainring easily considering the oddness of the crankset.
Usually on Shimano triples, you find the outer chainring nuts and bolts which are exposed to the outside of the crankarm and then there is another set of chainring bolts that hold the small chainring in place and are hidden by the backside of the crankarm.
#15
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I never would have thought that this crankset would be so unusual. I bought this bike new back in 1997, so I know that the crankset's odd construction originated with Shimano. I remember reading somewhere years ago that this FC500 crankset was typically used on hybrid bikes. The 1997 Nirvana was essentially a 26" steel MTB-based hybrid. It retailed for about $500.
Sounds like a new chainring is out of the question. Thanks for the info!
Sounds like a new chainring is out of the question. Thanks for the info!