Meshe Chonde, MD

Meshe Chonde, MD

Cardiac Intensivist and Heart Failure/Transplant Specialist

Los Angeles, California, United States
250 followers 249 connections

About

Cardiac intensivist with expertise in heart failure/transplant. My research focuses on the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support and the development of algorithms to guide implementation, escalation and referral patterns in the management of acute cardiogenic shock.

Activity

Experience

  • Cedars-Sinai Graphic

    Cardiac Intensivist, Assistant Professor

    Cedars-Sinai

    - Present 2 years 10 months

    Los Angeles, California, United States

  • UCLA Health Graphic

    Heart Failure/Transplant Fellow

    UCLA Health

    - 1 year 1 month

    Los Angeles, California, United States

  • Kaiser Permanente Graphic

    Cardiac Intensivist in Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit

    Kaiser Permanente

    - 1 year 3 months

    Los Angeles, California, United States

  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Graphic

    Non-Invasive Cardiologist and Intensivist

    U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

    - 2 years

    Los Angeles, California, United States

  • UPMC

    UPMC

    4 years 2 months

    • UPMC Graphic

      Critical Care Medicine Fellowship

      UPMC

      - 1 year 2 months

      Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

    • UPMC Graphic

      Cardiology Fellowship

      UPMC

      - 3 years 1 month

  • Cedars-Sinai

    Cedars-Sinai

    4 years

    • Cedars-Sinai Graphic

      Chief Resident

      Cedars-Sinai

      - 1 year

      Greater Los Angeles Area

    • Cedars-Sinai Graphic

      Resident Physician

      Cedars-Sinai

      - 3 years 1 month

      Greater Los Angeles Area

Education

Publications

  • Challenges in the development and implementation of a healthcare system based extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) program for the treatment of out of hospital cardiac arrest

    Resuscitation

    Introduction: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) can treat cardiac arrest refractory to conventional therapies. Many institutions are interested in developing their own ECPR program. However, there may be challenges in logistics and implementation. Methods: We developed out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) ECPR protocols for Emergency Medical Services (EMS), EMS communications, and our in-hospital ECPR team. Inclusion criteria indentified patients with a potentially reversible…

    Introduction: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) can treat cardiac arrest refractory to conventional therapies. Many institutions are interested in developing their own ECPR program. However, there may be challenges in logistics and implementation. Methods: We developed out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) ECPR protocols for Emergency Medical Services (EMS), EMS communications, and our in-hospital ECPR team. Inclusion criteria indentified patients with a potentially reversible arrest etiology and high probability of recoverable brain injury using a simple checklist: witnessed collapse, layperson CPR, initial shockable rhythm, and age 18-60 years. We trained local EMS crews to screen patients and reviewed the criteria with a Medic Command Physician prior to transport to our hospital. Results: From October 2015 to March 31st 2018, EMS treated 1165 EMS OHCA cases, transported 664 (57%) to a local hospital, and transported 120 (10%) to our institution. Of these, five (4.1%) patients underwent ECPR. Among excluded cases, 64 (53%) had nonshockable rhythms, 48 (40%) were unwitnessed arrests, 50 (42%) were over age 60 and the remaining 20 (17%) had no documented reasons for exclusion. For ECPR cases, median pre-hospital CPR duration was 26 [IQR 25-40] min. Four patients (80%) received mechanical CPR. Interval from arrest to arrival on scene was 5 [IQR 4-6] min and interval from radio call to activation of ECPR was 13 [IQR 7-21] min. Interval from EMS dispatch to departure from scene was 20 [IQR 19-21] min. Time from EMS dispatch to initiation of ECPR was 63 [IQR 59-69] min. Conclusions: ECPR is an infrequent occurrence in EMS practice. Most apparently eligible patients did not get ECPR, highlighting the need for ongoing programmatic development, provider education, and qualitative work exploring barriers to implementation.

    See publication
  • Intra-Arrest Administration of Cyclosporine and Methylprednisolone Does Not Reduce Postarrest Myocardial Dysfunction

    BioMed Research International

    Objective

    To determine whether the administration of intra-arrest cyclosporine (CCY) and methylprednisolone (MP) preserves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and cardiac output (CO) after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).
    Methods

    Eleven, 25-30kg female swine were randomized to receive 10mg/kg CCY + 40mg MP or placebo, anesthetized and given a transthoracic shock to induce ventricular fibrillation. After 8 minutes, standard CPR was started. After two additional…

    Objective

    To determine whether the administration of intra-arrest cyclosporine (CCY) and methylprednisolone (MP) preserves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and cardiac output (CO) after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).
    Methods

    Eleven, 25-30kg female swine were randomized to receive 10mg/kg CCY + 40mg MP or placebo, anesthetized and given a transthoracic shock to induce ventricular fibrillation. After 8 minutes, standard CPR was started. After two additional minutes, the experimental agent was administered. Animals with ROSC were supported for up to 12h with norepinephrine as needed. Echocardiography was performed at baseline, and 1, 2, 6 and 12h post-ROSC. Analysis was performed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) after downsampling continuously sampled data to 5 minute epochs.
    Results

    Eight animals (64%) achieved ROSC after a median of 7 [IQR 5-13] min of CPR, 2 [ IQR 1-3] doses of epinephrine and 2 [IQR 1-5] defibrillation shocks. Animals receiving CCY+MP had higher post ROSC MAP (GEE coefficient -10.2, P = <0.01), but reduced cardiac output (GEE coefficient 0.8, P = <0.01) compared to placebo. There was no difference in LVEF or vasopressor use between arms.
    Conclusions

    Intra-arrest cyclosporine and methylprednisolone decreased post-arrest cardiac output and increased mean arterial pressure without affecting left ventricular ejection fraction.

    See publication
  • The Use of ECMO for the Treatment of Refractory Cardiac Arrest or Postarrest Cardiogenic Shock Following In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A 10-Year Experience

    Journal of Intensive Care Medicine



    Objectives: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been increasingly used in the treatment of refractory cardiac arrest (extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation [ECPR]) and postarrest cardiogenic shock (PACS). Our primary objective was to determine the 1-year survival of patients who were treated with ECMO for PACS or in ECPR.

    Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of hospitalized patients in a tertiary care facility who underwent treatment with ECMO for ECPR…



    Objectives: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been increasingly used in the treatment of refractory cardiac arrest (extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation [ECPR]) and postarrest cardiogenic shock (PACS). Our primary objective was to determine the 1-year survival of patients who were treated with ECMO for PACS or in ECPR.

    Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of hospitalized patients in a tertiary care facility who underwent treatment with ECMO for ECPR or PACS. Between January 2004 and December 2013, patients were prospectively entered into an institutional registry. One-year follow-up was assessed by electronic medical record or social security death index if clinical follow-up was unavailable.

    Results: Fifty-one patients were treated with ECMO during the study period. The mean age was 54.0 ± 10.9 years; the majority of patients were men (80.4%). The most common etiology of arrest was acute myocardial infarction (51.0%). Overall, 13 (25.4%) patients survived for at least 1 year. Preexisting coronary artery disease, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia were associated with reduced likelihood of survival. We observed a significant improvement in 1-year mortality in patients treated for PACS when compared to ECPR, 46.7% versus 16.7%, respectively.

    Conclusion: The use of ECMO for treatment of refractory cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock may be a suitable treatment in a very select cohort of patients. Our results support a significantly higher 1-year survival in patients with PACS compared to refractory cardiac arrest.

    See publication
  • Echocardiographic left ventricular systolic dysfunction early after resuscitation from cardiac arrest does not predict mortality or vasopressor requirements

    Resuscitation

    Background/aims: Echocardiographic abnormalities are common after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. The association between echocardiographic findings with vasopressor requirements and mortality are not well described. We sought to determine the associations between echocardiographic abnormalities and mortality, vasopressor requirements and organ failure after cardiac arrest.

    Methods: We prospectively evaluated 55 adult subjects undergoing transthoracic echocardiography within 24h after…

    Background/aims: Echocardiographic abnormalities are common after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. The association between echocardiographic findings with vasopressor requirements and mortality are not well described. We sought to determine the associations between echocardiographic abnormalities and mortality, vasopressor requirements and organ failure after cardiac arrest.

    Methods: We prospectively evaluated 55 adult subjects undergoing transthoracic echocardiography within 24h after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. We evaluated the association between 2D echocardiographic and Doppler measurements and mortality, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores and vasopressor requirements.

    Results: Inpatient mortality was 60%. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 43.6%; LVEF was <40% in 36% of subjects. None of the measured echocardiographic parameters (including LVEF) was significantly associated with inpatient mortality (all p>0.1). Subjects with LVEF <40% more often had shockable arrest rhythms and patients resuscitated from shockable rhythms had lower mean LVEF (36.2% vs. 52.3%, p=0.001). There was no correlation between markers of right and left ventricular systolic or diastolic function (including LVEF and Doppler parameters) with vasopressor requirements, lactate levels or SOFA scores.

    Conclusion: Echocardiographic parameters (including LVEF) were not associated with inpatient mortality after cardiac arrest. Vasopressor requirements and organ failure severity were not associated with multiple echocardiographic markers of systolic function

    See publication
  • Myocardial Dysfunction and Shock after Cardiac Arrest

    BioMed Research International

    Postarrest myocardial dysfunction includes the development of low cardiac output or ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction after cardiac arrest. Impaired left ventricular systolic function is reported in nearly two-thirds of patients resuscitated after cardiac arrest. Hypotension and shock requiring vasopressor support are similarly common after cardiac arrest. Whereas shock requiring vasopressor support is consistently associated with an adverse outcome after cardiac arrest, the…

    Postarrest myocardial dysfunction includes the development of low cardiac output or ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction after cardiac arrest. Impaired left ventricular systolic function is reported in nearly two-thirds of patients resuscitated after cardiac arrest. Hypotension and shock requiring vasopressor support are similarly common after cardiac arrest. Whereas shock requiring vasopressor support is consistently associated with an adverse outcome after cardiac arrest, the association between myocardial dysfunction and outcomes is less clear. Myocardial dysfunction and shock after cardiac arrest develop as the result of preexisting cardiac pathology with multiple superimposed insults from resuscitation. The pathophysiology involves cardiovascular ischemia/reperfusion injury and cardiovascular toxicity from excessive levels of inflammatory cytokine activation and catecholamines, among other contributing factors. Similar mechanisms occur in myocardial dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass, in sepsis, and in stress-induced cardiomyopathy. Hemodynamic stabilization after resuscitation from cardiac arrest involves restoration of preload, vasopressors to support arterial pressure, and inotropic support if needed to reverse the effects of myocardial dysfunction and improve systemic perfusion. Further research is needed to define the role of postarrest myocardial dysfunction on cardiac arrest outcomes and identify therapeutic strategies.

    See publication

View Meshe’s full profile

  • See who you know in common
  • Get introduced
  • Contact Meshe directly
Join to view full profile

Other similar profiles

Explore collaborative articles

We’re unlocking community knowledge in a new way. Experts add insights directly into each article, started with the help of AI.

Explore More

Add new skills with these courses

Meshe’s public profile badge

Include this LinkedIn profile on other websites

Meshe Chonde, MD

Meshe Chonde, MD

Cardiac Intensivist and Heart Failure/Transplant Specialist

  • company image for Cedars-Sinai

    Cardiac Intensivist, Assistant Professor at Cedars-Sinai

  • school image for The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences

    The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences

View profile badges