Skip to main content
Log in

Management des refraktären Status epilepticus

Eine Bestandsaufnahme aus neurologischer und neuropädiatrischer Sicht

Management of refractory status epilepticus from a neurologic and neuropediatric perspective

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
Der Nervenarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Der Status epilepticus ist einer der häufigsten neurologischen Notfälle. Bei 60–70% aller Patienten mit Status epilepticus beendet die Gabe von Benzodiazepinen und Phenytoin die epileptische Aktivität. Die eigentliche Herausforderung ergibt sich erst, wenn der Status epilepticus persistiert und damit refraktär ist. Patienten bedürfen dann häufig der Gabe von anästhesierenden Antiepileptika oder anderer eingreifender Maßnahmen, so dass spätestens ab diesem Zeitpunkt das weitere Management auf einer Intensivstation erfolgen muss. Die Empfehlungen in aktuellen Leitlinien gehen in der Regel detailliert auf die Initialtherapie des Status epilepticus ein und können dabei auf Daten randomisierter kontrollierter Studien zurückgreifen. Das weitere Vorgehen beim refraktären Status epilepticus wird dagegen häufig nur kursorisch dargestellt, hier liegen ausschließlich Daten retrospektiver und unkontrollierter prospektiver Untersuchungen vor. Weil der Status epilepticus jedoch in einem Drittel der Fälle refraktär ist, ist eine Bestandsaufnahme hinsichtlich des weiteren Managements dringend erforderlich. Der epileptologisch und neuropädiatrisch besetzte Königsteiner Arbeitskreis hat sich bei seiner 31. Tagung im März 2006 mit dem klinischen und experimentellen Szenario und den impliziten prognostischen Variablen des refraktären Status epilepticus auseinandergesetzt. Wir möchten die Ergebnisse dieser Diskussionen darstellen und aus neurologischer und neuropädiatrischer Sicht Empfehlungen zum aktuellen und zukünftigen Management des refraktären Status epilepticus aussprechen.

Summary

Status epilepticus is a frequent neurologic emergency that is refractory to benzodiazepines and phenytoin in 60% to 70% of cases. Patients commonly require management in an intensive care unit incorporating aggressive treatment with intravenous anaesthetics. Treatment guidelines commonly comment on initial pharmacologic management in detail, as they can refer to data from randomised controlled trials. In contrast, recommendations for the management of refractory status epilepticus often are sparse, as they rely on data from retrospective or uncontrolled prospective studies only. Since status epilepticus is refractory in every third patient, a critical analysis of the available data and a review focussing on the further management of this condition are urgently needed. The Koenigstein Team, a panel of expert epileptologists and neuropediatricians, discussed at its 31st meeting in March 2006 the clinical and experimental aspects and implicit prognostic variables of refractory status epilepticus. Here we present the results of that discussion and state recommendations from a neurologic and neuropediatric perspective for current und future management of refractory status epilepticus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy (1981) Proposal for revised clinical and electroencephalographic classification of epileptic seizures. Epilepsia 22: 489–501

    Google Scholar 

  2. America’s Working Group on Status Epilepticus (1993) Treatment of convulsive status epilepticus. Recommendations of the Epilepsy Foundation of America’s Working Group on Status Epilepticus. JAMA 270: 854–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gastaut H (1983) Classification of status epilepticus. Adv Neurol 34: 15–35

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lowenstein DH, Bleck T, Macdonald RL (1999) It’s time to revise the definition of status epilepticus. Epilepsia 40: 120–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shinnar S, Berg AT, Moshe SL, Shinnar R (2001) How long do new-onset seizures in children last? Ann Neurol 49: 659–664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanley DF, Kross JF (1998) Use of midazolam in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus. Clin Ther 20: 1093–1105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Prasad A, Worrall BB, Bertram EH, Bleck TP (2001) Propofol and midazolam in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus. Epilepsia 42: 380–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cascino GD (1996) Generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 71: 787–792

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lowenstein DH, Alldredge BK (1998) Status epilepticus. N Engl J Med 338: 970–976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jagoda A, Riggio S (1993) Refractory status epilepticus in adults. Ann Emerg Med 22: 1337–1348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stecker MM, Kramer TH, Raps EC et al. (1998) Treatment of refractory status epilepticus with propofol: clinical and pharmacokinetic findings. Epilepsia 39: 18–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Treiman DM, Meyers PD, Walton NY et al. (1998) A comparison of four treatments for generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Veterans Affairs Status Epilepticus Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med 339: 792–798

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mayer SA, Claassen J, Lokin J et al. (2002) Refractory status epilepticus: frequency, risk factors, and impact on outcome. Arch Neurol 59: 205–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Holtkamp M, Othman J, Buchheim K, Meierkord H (2005) Predictors and prognosis of refractory status epilepticus treated in a neurological intensive care unit. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76: 534–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rossetti AO, Logroscino G, Bromfield EB (2005) Refractory status epilepticus: effect of treatment aggressiveness on prognosis. Arch Neurol 62: 1698–1702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Knake S, Rosenow F, Vescovi M et al. (2001) Incidence of status epilepticus in adults in Germany: a prospective, population-based study. Epilepsia 42: 714–718

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. DeLorenzo RJ, Towne AR, Pellock JM, Ko D (1992) Status epilepticus in children, adults, and the elderly. Epilepsia [Suppl 4] 33: S15–S25

  18. DeLorenzo RJ, Hauser WA, Towne AR et al. (1996) A prospective, population-based epidemiologic study of status epilepticus in Richmond, Virginia. Neurology 46: 1029–1035

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hesdorffer DC, Logroscino G, Cascino G et al. (1998) Incidence of status epilepticus in Rochester, Minnesota, 1965–1984. Neurology 50: 735–741

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shinnar S, Pellock JM, Moshe SL et al. (1997) In whom does status epilepticus occur: age-related differences in children. Epilepsia 38: 907–914

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hauser WA (1990) Status epilepticus: epidemiologic considerations. Neurology 40: 9–13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Phillips SA, Shanahan RJ (1989) Etiology and mortality of status epilepticus in children. A recent update. Arch Neurol 46: 74–76

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Manno EM (2003) New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 78: 508–518

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rona S, Rosenow F, Arnold S et al. (2005) A semiological classification of status epilepticus. Epileptic Disord 7: 5–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shorvon S (2005) The classification of status epilepticus. Epileptic Disord 7: 1–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pohlmann-Eden B, Hoch DB, Cochius JI, Chiappa KH (1996) Periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges--a critical review. J Clin Neurophysiol 13: 519–530

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Treiman DM (1993) Generalized convulsive status epilepticus in the adult. Epilepsia [Suppl 1] 34: S2–S11

  28. Sharbrough FW (1997) Controversies in clinical neurophysiology: which EEG patterns of status epilepticus warrant emergent treatment? J Clin Neurophysiol 14: 159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hirsch LJ, Claassen J, Mayer SA, Emerson RG (2004) Stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs): a common EEG phenomenon in the critically ill. Epilepsia 45: 109–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pohlmann-Eden B (2005) Issues when treating epilepsy in the elderly. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 181: 40–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rowan AJ, Ramsay RE, Collins JF et al. (2005) New onset geriatric epilepsy: a randomized study of gabapentin, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine. Neurology 64: 1868–1873

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Shorvon S (ed) (1994) Status epilepticus: its clinical features and treatment in children and adults. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  33. Vignatelli L, Tonon C, D’Alessandro R (2003) Incidence and short-term prognosis of status epilepticus in adults in Bologna, Italy. Epilepsia 44: 964–968

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Coeytaux A, Jallon P, Galobardes B, Morabia A (2000) Incidence of status epilepticus in French-speaking Switzerland: (EPISTAR). Neurology 55: 693–697

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Siemes H, Bourgeois BFD (2001) Status epilepticus. In: Siemes H, Bourgeois BFD (Hrsg) Anfälle und Epilepsien bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 180–191

  36. Kramer U, Shorer Z, Ben Zeev B et al. (2005) Severe refractory status epilepticus owing to presumed encephalitis. J Child Neurol 20: 184–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Baxter P, Clarke A, Cross H et al. (2003) Idiopathic catastrophic epileptic encephalopathy presenting with acute onset intractable status. Seizure 12: 379–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mikaeloff Y, Jambaque I, Hertz-Pannier L et al. (2006) Devastating epileptic encephalopathy in school-aged children (DESC): a pseudo encephalitis. Epilepsy Res 69: 67–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Morishima T, Togashi T, Yokota S et al. (2002) Encephalitis and encephalopathy associated with an influenza epidemic in Japan. Clin Infect Dis 35: 512–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Alldredge BK, Gelb AM, Isaacs SM et al. (2001) A comparison of lorazepam, diazepam, and placebo for the treatment of out-of-hospital status epilepticus. N Engl J Med 345: 631–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Scott RC, Besag FM, Neville BG (1999) Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomised trial. Lancet 353: 623–626

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Walton NY (1993) Systemic effects of generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Epilepsia [Suppl 1] 34: S54–S58

  43. Limdi NA, Shimpi AV, Faught E et al. (2005) Efficacy of rapid IV administration of valproic acid for status epilepticus. Neurology 64: 353–355

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Misra UK, Kalita J, Patel R (2006) Sodium valproate vs phenytoin in status epilepticus: a pilot study. Neurology 67: 340–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Claassen J, Hirsch LJ, Emerson RG, Mayer SA (2002) Treatment of refractory status epilepticus with pentobarbital, propofol, or midazolam: a systematic review. Epilepsia 43: 146–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Holtkamp M, Othman J, Buchheim K et al. (2005) A „malignant“ variant of status epilepticus. Arch Neurol 62: 1428–1431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kaplan PW (1999) Assessing the outcomes in patients with nonconvulsive status epilepticus: nonconvulsive status epilepticus is underdiagnosed, potentially overtreated, and confounded by comorbidity. J Clin Neurophysiol 16: 341–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Walker MC, Perry H, Scaravilli F et al. (1999) Halothane as a neuroprotectant during constant stimulation of the perforant path. Epilepsia 40: 359–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Peters CN, Pohlmann-Eden B (2005) Intravenous valproate as an innovative therapy in seizure emergency situations including status epilepticus–experience in 102 adult patients. Seizure 14: 164–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ropper AH (ed) (2003) Neurological and neurosurgical intensive care. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Boston

  51. Rossetti AO, Bromfield EB (2005) Levetiracetam in the treatment of status epilepticus in adults: a study of 13 episodes. Eur Neurol 54: 34–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Patel NC, Landan IR, Levin J et al. (2006) The use of levetiracetam in refractory status epilepticus. Seizure 15: 137–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bensalem MK, Fakhoury TA (2003) Topiramate and status epilepticus: report of three cases. Epilepsy Behav 4: 757–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Towne AR, Garnett LK, Waterhouse EJ et al. (2003) The use of topiramate in refractory status epilepticus. Neurology 60: 332–334

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Reuber M, Pukrop R, Mitchell AJ et al. (2003) Clinical significance of recurrent psychogenic nonepileptic seizure status. J Neurol 250: 1355–1362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Howell SJ, Owen L, Chadwick DW (1989) Pseudostatus epilepticus. Q J Med 71: 507–519

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Holtkamp M, Othman J, Buchheim K, Meierkord H (2006) Diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic status epilepticus in the emergency setting. Neurology 66: 1727–1729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Reuber M, Elger CE (2003) Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: review and update. Epilepsy Behav 4: 205–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Libman MD, Potvin L, Coupal L, Grover SA (1991) Seizure vs. syncope: measuring serum creatine kinase in the emergency department. J Gen Intern Med 6: 408–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Chen DK, So YT, Fisher RS (2005) Use of serum prolactin in diagnosing epileptic seizures: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 65: 668–675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Pohlmann-Eden B (2000) Anfallstherapie im Status epilepticus. Irrtümer, Gesichertes und Perspektiven. Nervenheilkunde 19: 106–112

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wirrell EC, Camfield PR, Gordon KE et al. (1995) Benign rolandic epilepsy: atypical features are very common. J Child Neurol 10: 455–458

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Ferrie C, Caraballo R, Covanis A et al. (2006) Panayiotopoulos syndrome: a consensus view. Dev Med Child Neurol 48: 236–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Raspall-Chaure M, Chin RF, Neville BG, Scott RC (2006) Outcome of paediatric convulsive status epilepticus: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 5: 769–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Pohlmann-Eden B, Gass A, Peters CN et al. (2004) Evolution of MRI changes and development of bilateral hippocampal sclerosis during long lasting generalised status epilepticus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75: 898–900

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Hesdorffer DC, Logroscino G, Cascino G et al. (1998) Risk of unprovoked seizure after acute symptomatic seizure: effect of status epilepticus. Ann Neurol 44: 908–912

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Logroscino G, Hesdorffer DC, Cascino G et al. (1997) Short-term mortality after a first episode of status epilepticus. Epilepsia 38: 1344–1349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Logroscino G, Hesdorffer DC, Cascino GD et al. (2002) Long-term mortality after a first episode of status epilepticus. Neurology 58: 537–541

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Tasker RC (1998) Emergency treatment of acute seizures and status epilepticus. Arch Dis Child 79: 78–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor weist auf eine Verbindung mit folgender Firma hin: Desitin Arzneimittel GmbH (Hamburg). Trotz des möglichen Interessenkonfliktes ist der Beitrag unabhängig und produktneutral.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Holtkamp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pohlmann-Eden, B., Stephani, U., Krägeloh-Mann, I. et al. Management des refraktären Status epilepticus. Nervenarzt 78, 871–882 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-007-2257-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-007-2257-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation