Academia.eduAcademia.edu
11/12/2013 Introduction  Value of preparing a checklist of expected scenario participants’ clinical actions.  Dr Ramawad Soobrah  Hertfordshire Intensive Care & Emergency Simulation Centre, University of Hertfordshire, UK ( Alinier G, Brennan M ) Introduction (2)  -   Post-operative wound infection Epilepsy Myocardial infarction Appendicitis    Scenario 1 Wound infection (Peter Ward) PS Scenario 2 Acute Abdomen (Thomas Moore) PP PS   Scenario 3 Epileptic drunk woman (Julie Watts) PP PS Scenario 4 MI and Cardiac Arrest (James Eddisson) PP PS Focussed history from patient Full history from patient Full history from patient and friend Focussed history taking and elicit risk factors for IHD Examination – chest, urine, cannula sites, wound, abdomen Abdominal examination – recognised generalised peritonitis O2 MONA (Monitor, O2, Nitrates, Aspirin) Blood tests (WCC,CRP) Analgesia Brief neurological assessment Analgesia Blood culture Blood tests IV access Recognised patient having an MI (on ECG) Wound swab for culture IV fluids Analgesia Blood tests IV fluids Erect CXR Request X-ray Recognised VF and check patient (?palpable pulse ?responsive) IV antibiotics (local hospital guidelines) IV antibiotics IV Lorazepam/ rectal Diazepam Ask for senior help (call crash team) Ask for senior review Ask for surgical review Ask for senior help Start basic life support PS – performed satisfactorily PP – performed partially Careful observation of participants’ actions and behaviours is key to the conduction of the debriefing. During a scenario, a number of simultaneous tasks need to be carried out by the facilitation team. Method Training session with Physician Assistant (PA) students 1 participant & 7 observers (4 scenarios) Scenarios:  Running high-fidelity simulation sessions is labour intensive. PP A checklist was designed to help the lead facilitator rapidly mark off participants’ expected actions. The checklist for each scenario was produced in a tabular form. Individually designed based on clinical guidelines. Actions were recorded next to each objective as having been performed satisfactorily or partially. Anaesthetists' Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) Fletcher G et al. Anaesthetists' Non-Technical Skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system. Br J Anaesth. 2003; 90(5): 580-8. 1 11/12/2013 Outcome   The table allowed the lead facilitator to record the key required clinical actions in a succinct manner. Lead facilitator’s attention focused on critically observing the participants’ clinical assessment and management of the “patient”. Conclusion     Checklist as a tool to assist observation and debriefing by the facilitators. Table adaptable to the specific requirements of other scenarios. Personal experience: Helpful tool Can be given as a handout (at the end of the session!) or formative feedback on performance. 2