Next Article in Journal
Aphids and Mycorrhizal Fungi Shape Maternal Effects in Senecio vulgaris
Next Article in Special Issue
Planoplatessa gen. nov.—A New, Neglected Monoraphid Diatom Genus with a Cavum
Previous Article in Journal
New Insights into Phase Separation Processes and Membraneless Condensates of EIN2
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Warps and Wefts of a Polyploidy Complex: Integrative Species Delimitation of the Diploid Leucanthemum (Compositae, Anthemideae) Representatives
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 16
10.3390/plants11162148
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Description of the Soil Diatom Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. (Bacillariophyceae, Sellaphoraceae) from Vietnam, with Remarks on the Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Sellaphora and Systematic Position of Microcostatus

by
Anton Glushchenko
1,
Elena Kezlya
1,
Yevhen Maltsev
1,
Sergei Genkal
2,
John Patrick Kociolek
3 and
Maxim Kulikovskiy
1,*
1
K.A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology RAS, IPP RAS, 35 Botanicheskaya St., 127276 Moscow, Russia
2
Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters RAS, IBIW RAS, Borok, 152742 Yaroslavl Region, Russia
3
Museum of Natural History, Henderson Building, 15th and Broadway, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(16), 2148; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162148
Submission received: 22 July 2022 / Revised: 12 August 2022 / Accepted: 17 August 2022 / Published: 18 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrative Taxonomy of Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In material isolated from soils of Cát Tiên National Park, we isolated four strains that were assigned to the genus Sellaphora. Identification was carried out on the basis of morphological and molecular studies. We proposed a new species named Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. An evolutionary distance matrix, based on the 18S rDNA gene including the V4 domain, showed the new species shared 94.1–97.2% similarities with other Sellaphora sequences. The new species is morphologically similar to species previously identified as representatives of the genus Microcostatus.

1. Introduction

The genus Sellaphora Mereschkowsky was described in 1902 [1]. It has over 250 species [2,3]. It is the largest genus in the family Sellaphoraceae, which also includes the genera Buryatia Kulikovskiy, Lange-Bertalot, and Metzeltin; Caponea Podzorski; Dimidiata Hajos; Diprora Main; Eolimna Lange-Bertalot and Schiller; Fallacia Stickle and D.G. Mann; Lacuneolimna Tudesque, Le Cohu, and Lange-Bertalot; Okhapkinia Glushchenko, Kulikovskiy, and Kociolek; and Rossia Voigt [2,3,4,5]. Currently, species of the genus Sellaphora, relative to other genera of the family, are the best studied using morphological, cytological, reproductive, and molecular methods [6,7,8,9,10,11,12].
The monophyly of Sellaphora has been well supported in a number of studies [6,9,13,14,15]. Currently, there are 550 sequences for 39 taxonomic units of Sellaphora deposited in GenBank (data on 1 August 2022), of which 17 have been identified to the species level, four taxa have been identified presumptively, and 18 have not been identified.
Sellaphora pupula is the type species of the genus [16]. The species complex of S. pupula (Kützing) Mereschkowsky (230 sequences in GenBank; data on 1 August 2022) has been the most studied taxa within the genus. It is a common and frequently reported species and has long been classified as a taxon of high morphological variability [17,18], resulting in many variations being described [19]. Study of the molecular structure of this species complex has been primarily related to questions of species boundaries, the biological significance of variations, the study of cryptic and pseudocryptic diversity, biogeography, relationships of phylogeny and morphometric characters, and problems of speciation [6,8,12,20,21]. This species complex was also used as a convenient model for testing the resolution of various genetic markers [9,22]. As a result, it has been shown that “S. pupula (Navicula pupula sensu Hustedt [17,23]; Krammer and Lange-Bertalot [24]) represents a paraphyletic group” [12], while morphological synapomorphies for species separation have not been clearly defined. The results of experimental mating tests indicate that clones of different populations from the same reservoir with differences in size, valve shape, or striae density (so-called demes) are not compatible [6,13,16,25]. On the contrary, when studying the molecular structure of the genes of S. auldreekie D.G. Mann and S.M. McDonald, S. bisexualis D.G. Mann and K.M. Evans, and S. capitata D.G. Mann and S.M. McDonald, it was shown that the sequences of strains obtained from very distant places with different climates (tropical in Australia and temperate in UK) were identical [15,20,26], which indicates a wide distribution of individual genetic lines.
The genus is distributed all over the world, inhabiting different types of water bodies and soils [4,27,28]. All Sellaphora clones studied to date have been isolated from fresh water bodies, and the vast majority of strains were obtained in Europe: UK (Scotland), Belgium, Germany, and Czech Republic [9,12,20,21,22]. No more than four strains of Sellaphora have been deposited in GenBank from Japan, South Korea, Mexico, and New Zealand (subtropics); Tanzania and East Africa (subequatorial climate); and USA, Dakota country, located in Minnesota (continental climate). From tropical regions, 19 Sellaphora strains have been studied in water bodies of Australia [9,20,22] and one in the Hawaiian Islands [29]. Soil strains for representatives of this genus using molecular approaches have not yet been studied. At the same time, as noted in the work of [30], devoted to the study of Coccomyxa Schmidle, the ecological characteristics of the species (such as living stage and habitat) are in good agreement with the phylogeny (and may be the basis for the identification of the species) if the lineage is well maintained. At the same time, the acquisition of molecular sequences, along with well-studied morphology, plays an important role in the accumulation of data for the correct identification of taxa using high-throughput sequencing (HTS) methods.
The aerophilic diatom flora of Southeast Asia are not well studied. Our work has focused on the diatoms of soils of Cát Tiên National Park. Work has been carried out on the composition and structure of forest soil algocenoses in this national park [31]. In addition, species from the genera Mayamaea Lange-Bertalot and Placoneis Mereschkowsky were described from the soils of this national park [32,33]. However, a targeted study of Sellaphora species from the soils of Southeast Asia had not been attempted previously. For comparison, we can only point to the species described by Friedrich Hustedt from Indonesia, which currently belong to the genus Sellaphora: S. subbacillum (Hustedt) Falasco et al. [34] and S. perventralis (Hustedt) Tuji [35]. However, S. subbacillum (as Navicula subbacillum Hustedt) was noted as an aerophilic species [36]. Thus, we can conclude that the soil diatom flora of Southeast Asia requires systematic investigation.

2. Results

2.1. Taxonomic Analysis

Sellaphora terrestris Glushchenko, Kezlya, Maltsev, and Kulikovskiy sp. nov. (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4).
Holotype here designated: Slide no. 07062a (Figure 1G), from oxidized culture strain B703, isolated from the sample 195, deposited in herbarium of MHA, Main Botanical Garden Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Isotype. Slide no. 07062b, Collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Reference strain. VP304, isolated in from the sample no. Kt59, deposited in the collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology Russian.
Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Representative specimens. Strain VP304 (slide no. 07062a), VP272 (slide no. 07030), VP303 (slide no. 07061), VP299 (slide no. 07057); sample Kt33 (slide no. 07223), Kt59 (slide no. 06989), Kt60 (Slide no. 07232).
Type locality. Southeast Vietnam, Cát Tiên National Park, agricultural field soil surface, 11°24.241′ N, 107°22.468′ E.
Sequence data. Partial 18S rDNA gene sequences comprising V4 domain (GenBank accession numbers: ON332057 for VP304, ON332054 for VP272, ON332055 for VP299, ON332056 for VP303) and partial rbcL sequences (GenBank accession numbers: ON350766 for VP304, ON350763 for VP272, ON350764 for VP299, ON350765 for VP303).
Etymology. The specific epithet “terrestris” refers to the terrestrial habitat from where the new species was extracted.
Distribution. So far only known only from the Cát Tiên National Park (agricultural and forest soils).
Comment. We investigated the four strains of S. terrestris (VP304, VP272, VP299, VP303) and found that there were some morphological differences expressed across the strains. In particular, strain VP299 (Figure 4) has smaller valves, almost elliptical, without distinct apices (length 5.2–6.9 μm and width 3.7–4.0 μm) in comparison with VP304, VP303, and VP272 (length 11–14.3 μm and width 4.5–5.1 μm). Apparently, the strain VP299 presented the smallest valves during the valve diminution series. Despite these differences, all of these strains form one branch with maximum statistical support on the phylogenetic tree.
Description. LM (Figure 1A–L, Figure 2A–L, Figure 3A–L, and Figure 4A–L). The chloroplast structure was not observed. Valves linear-elliptical to elliptical with weakly convex margins. Ends are short rostrate to broadly rounded. Length 6.9–17.1 µm, width 3.7–6.1 µm. Axial area narrow, weakly extended to the central area. Central area small, longitudinally lanceolate. Raphe filiform, straight. Proximal raphe ends weakly expanded. Central raphe ends poorly visible in LM. Striae weakly radiate, almost parallel at the central part of valve, 28–35 in 10 µm. Areolae not resolved in LM.
SEM, external view (Figure 1M–O, Figure 2M–O and Figure 3M). Axial area forming two longitudinal grooves, which expand from the ends of the valves to their central part (Figure 1M, Figure 2M, and Figure 3M, black arrows). Raphe is straight, lying in raised, slightly asymmetrical conopeum (Figure 1M,N, Figure 2M,N and Figure 3M, white arrowheads). Proximal raphe ends almost straight, drop-shaped (Figure 1N and Figure 2N, black arrows). Distal raphe ends bent to one side and extending to the valve mantle (Figure 1M,O and Figure 3M, white arrows). Areolae rectangular to rounded, 60–65 in 10 µm.
SEM, internal view (Figure 1P–R, Figure 2P–R, Figure 3N–P and Figure 4M–O). The axial area is quite wide, moving into an even wider central area (Figure 1P and Figure 5O, black arrows). The striae in the central part are noticeably shortened, up to 3–5 areolae per striae (Figure 1Q and Figure 3N, white arrows). Areolae covered by hymenes (Figure 2Q, white arrow). Raphe filiform, central raphe ends unilaterally slightly deflected (Figure 1P; 6O, white arrowheads), distal raphe ends curved in opposite directions and terminate as small helictoglossae (Figure 1P and Figure 6O, black arrowheads). Rounded apical pits are present at both apices (Figure 1Q and Figure 2P,R, black arrows).
Variability of the morphology of our species both in the natural material and in culture was noted (Table 1, Figure 5). This variability is expressed mainly in the shape of the valve ends. The cultivated strains are distinguished by having narrow valve apices. However, the ends of the valves range from beak-shaped (in large specimens) to broadly rounded (in small specimens). The shape of the valves themselves varies from linear-lanceolate and linear-elliptical to elliptical. At the same time, such features as the shape of the central and axial areas are the same. Quantitative characteristics in natural populations and images from cultures are quite similar. The length of valves in natural samples was 6.9–17.1 µm; in culture, it was 5.2–14.3 µm. The width of valves in natural samples was 4.2–6.1 µm; in culture, this parameter was 3.7–5.1 µm. Striae density in specimens from nature was 29–32 µm; in culture, the striae density was 28–35 µm (Table 1). Despite changes in the shape of the valves of the species introduced into culture, molecular genetic analysis allowed us to reliably establish the identity of the studied strains (Figure 6 and Figure 7).

2.2. Molecular Analysis

Phylogenetic relationships within the genus Sellaphora were reconstructed using the maximum likelihood (ML, where LB is the bootstrap value) and Bayesian (Bayesian inference, where PP is the posterior probability) methods. The analysis used two approaches to determine the position of new Sellaphora soil strains: building trees based on the rbcL gene, with the inclusion of all relevant nucleotide sequences available in GenBank (a total of 106 Sellaphora strains); and tree construction based on pooled rbcL and 18S rDNA gene alignments (35 Sellaphora strains in total). In both cases, as in previous studies on the phylogeny of Sellaphora strains, most of the sequences included in the analysis formed several well-supported clades (clades 1–3, Figure 6).
The strains of S. balashovae Andreeva, Kulikovskiy and Kociolek; S. laevissima (Kützing) D.G. Mann; S. minima (Grunow) D.G. Mann; and S. seminulum (Grunow) D.G. Mann remained outside these clades. In the rbcL tree, the studied soil strains of Sellaphora formed a single subclade with high statistical support (99 LB, 1.0 PP). This subclade is located in the basal part of the Sellaphora tree and was not included in the previously described clades 1–3. At the same time, S. seminulum strains, with the support of 78 LB, 1.0 PP act as a sister subclade. The addition of the 18S rDNA gene to the sequence analysis slightly changed the topology of the phylogenetic reconstruction, while the composition of clades 1–3 remained the same. It should be noted that the position of the S. minima strains was different between the two analyses. If in the rbcL tree they were between clades 2 and 3, then in the rbcL and 18S rDNA tree they are outside clades 1–3 (Figure 7). Moreover, in the extended reconstruction, soil strains of Sellaphora moved away from strains of S. seminulum and formed a single clade with strains of S. laevissima (Figure 7).
Partial ribosomal 18S rDNA gene fragments comprising the V4 domain of the new soil Sellaphora strains showed 100% similarity. The VP304 strain was selected for further comparison of the percentage similarity. The evolutionary distance matrix based on the partial 18S rDNA gene showed that the VP304 strain shared 94.1–97.2% similarities with the other Sellaphora strains (Table 2), and 96.7% and 97.2% similarities with the closest strains in the phylogenetic tree (S. laevissima THR1, S. laevissima THR4, Figure 7). Within clade 1B, similarity was noted at the level of 99.5–100%. Sellaphora strains within clade 2A are characterized by 98.2–99.2% similarity, with clade 2B having 99.0–99.7%. The greatest differences between Sellaphora strains were noted within clade 3, with up to 2.7% (Table 2). In general, strains VP304, THR1, THR4, and B385 had a high similarity of the 18S rDNA gene region (97.2–99.5%), which allowed us to propose a new clade 4 within the genus Sellaphora based on these strains, and which has a separate position on the phylogenetic tree of the rbcL and 18S rDNA genes (Figure 2). The only strains of Microcostatus sp. (MMDL 54701 and MMDL 54702) differed significantly, by 6.9%, according to the 18S rDNA gene sequence. At the same time, the differences with the available sequences of the 18S rDNA gene of Sellaphora strains reached 14.6%, which may indicate either a distant relationship with Sellaphora strains, or incorrect identification of strains MMDL 54701 and MMDL 54702, since there are no photomicrographs and other information for these strains.

3. Discussion

3.1. Morphology Discussion

S. seminulum is similar to S. terrestris sp. nov. in valve width (3.0–4.5 µm in S. seminulum versus 3.7–6.1 µm in S. terrestris sp. nov.). The shape of the valves in the two species is different: S. seminulum has a linear-lanceolate shape, and S. terrestris sp. nov. has a linear-elliptical shape. The central area of S. seminulum is transversely widened and bow-tie-shaped; in S. terrestris sp. nov. the central area has an elliptical shape (Table 3). When S. seminulum was examined using SEM, the valves of the species have a smooth outer surface without grooves, both in the central area and at the apex of the valves [37]. In the case of S. terrestris sp. nov., there are longitudinal grooves in the central part of the valves (Figure 3M,N, Figure 4M,N and Figure 5M). The raphe in S. seminulum is not elevated above the valve surface; in S. terrestris sp. nov. the raphe lies in the conopeum (Figure 3M, Figure 4M and Figure 5M). We used the terms grooves and conopeum for the genus Sellaphora, following Mann et al. [8].
The grooves in S. lundii do not reach the ends of the valves, ending approximately at the first or second long striae in the central part of the valves [27]. S. lundii [27] has a evident sternum; likewise, in S. terrestris sp. nov., conopeum is present (Figure 3M,N, Figure 4M,N and Figure 5M). In addition, both species have a structural characteristic of some Sellaphora: round apical pits at the tops of the valve ends [27].
S. laevissima differs from our species in the greater width of valves (7–10 µm in S. laevissima versus 3.7–6.1 µm in S. terrestris sp. nov.). The striae density in S. laevissima is 15–21/10 µm, while in S. terrestris sp. nov. it is 28–35/10 µm. The areola density in S. laevissima is 30–35/10 µm, while in S. terrestris sp. nov. it is 60–65/10 µm. The central area of S. laevissima has the shape of a bow-tie, transversely expanded; in S. terrestris sp. nov. the central area has an elliptical shape (Table 3).
S. balashovae is similar in its length, width of valves, and density of areolae to S. terrestris sp. nov. (Table 3). In general, the density of areolae in S. terrestris sp. nov. is higher than that shown for S. balashovae (60–65/10 µm for S. terrestris sp. nov. versus 60/10 µm for S. balashovae). The central area of S. balashovae is transversely widened and in the shape of a bow-tie; in S. terrestris sp. nov., the central area has an elliptical shape (Table 3). The ultrastructural features of the species also allow them to be confidently distinguished. In S. balashovae, there are no grooves in the central area, in contrast to S. terrestris sp. nov. (Figure 3M,N, Figure 4M,N and Figure 5M). The raphe in S. balashovae lies in raised sternum, while in S. terrestris sp. nov., the raphe lies in a conopeum [11].
S. davoutiana Heudre, Wetzel, Moreau, and Ector differs from our species in the elliptical-lanceolate shape of the valves. In S. terrestris sp. nov. valve shape ranges from linear-elliptical to elliptical. The shape of the ends of the valves also differs between the two species: S. davoutiana has widely subcapitated, broadly rounded ends; while in S. terrestris sp. nov., the spices are short rostrate, to broadly rounded (Table 3). Valve widths, striae density, and areolae are similar across the species (Table 3). The central and axial areas of S. davoutiana are rather small; while in S. terrestris sp. nov. they are more visible. The central area of S. davoutiana can be either elliptical or rectangular; in S. terrestris sp. nov., the central area is elliptical.
Ultrastructurally, S. davoutiana does not have grooves in the axial and central area of the valves [39], which were shown for S. terrestris sp. nov.; the areolae of S. davoutiana are larger and more rectangular [39]; while in S. terrestris sp. nov., the areolae are not always rectangular and have a smaller diameter (Figure 3M, Figure 4M and Figure 5M). The raphe in S. davoutiana lies on an evident sternum [39].
S. lundii Wetzel, Barragán, and Ector [27] differs from S. terrestris sp. nov. by its elliptical shape of the valves (in S. terrestris sp. nov., the valves have a linear-elliptical shape) and wider ends of the valves (in S. lundii, the valves have a shape from rostrate to slightly capitate; in our species, the ends of the valves have a shape from rostrate to broadly rounded). The striae density in S. lundii is generally lower than in S. terrestris sp. nov. (23–28/10 µm versus 28–35/10 µm). The areolae of S. lundii are larger and rectangular, while the areole of S. terrestris sp. nov. are of a smaller diameter and only partially rectangular to mostly rounded. The main similarity between S. lundii and S. terrestris sp. nov. is the presence of distinct grooves in the central area of the valves on both sides of the proximal raphe ends.
When studying the morphological features of the new species, we noticed morphological similarity with some taxa from the genus Microcostatus. The genus Microcostatus was described in 1998 [44], primarily based on the presence of transversely oriented microcostae located in the axial area of the valve; the shape of the chloroplast, which is two plastids located along the cingulum of frustule [44]; and the lack of a conopeum but presence of an elevated sternum inside, with two longitudinal depressions alongside, sensu [44]. Initially, the type of genus (M. krasskei) showed open areolae and on this basis the authors assigned the genus to the family Naviculaceae [44]. Later, for representatives of the genus, a hymenes was shown that individually covered each of the areolae on the inner surface of the valves [41,43]. The diversity of morphological characters in the species currently assigned to the genus Microcostatus cannot but draw attention to itself. For example, the microcostae in the species can be expressed to a greater or lesser, the structure of the striae is different (they consist of one macroareola, for example, in the species Microcostatus elisabethianus Van de Vijver and Ector or several areolae in striae, as in most species of the genus), the conopeum/pseudoconopeum may be present or absent, and the hymenes closes the openings of the areolae in different species from the inside or even from the outside (M. elisabethianus). A common property for a number of species of Sellaphora, Okhapkinia alexanderii Glushchenko, Kulikovskiy, and Kociolek in Kulikovskiy et al. [5] and Microcostatus (e.g., M. dexteri, M. egregius, M. naumannii) is the presence of a round apical pit on each internal valve margin.
Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. is morphologically similar to Microcostatus dexterii Stanek-Tarkowska, M. Rybak, and Czyż [43] and Microcostatus naumanii (Hustedt) Lange-Bertalot [41] (Table 3). The greatest similarities between these species are observed using SEM. Microcostatus dexterii [43] and S. terrestris sp. nov. (Figure 3M–O, Figure 4M,N and Figure 5M) have a raised, slightly asymmetrical raphe sternum. The orientation of the outer central and distal raphe ends also coincides in the species. As in the case of S. terrestris sp. nov. (Figure 3M,N, Figure 4M,N and Figure 5M), M. dexterii has longitudinal depressions that widen into the valve center and form an almost longitudinal lanceolate central area [43]. The authors did not indicate any pronounced microcostae, which are important morphological feature of the genus Microcostatus. Both species have a structure typical for some Sellaphora, that is, round apical pits at the apex of the valve ends [43]. Microcostatus dexterii differs from S. terrestris sp. nov. by its valve shape (lanceolate to elliptical-lanceolate vs linear-elliptical to elliptical), lower striae density (20–24/10 µm vs 28–35/10 µm), and areolae (45–50/10 µm vs 60–65/10 µm). The shape of the areolae in M. dexterii is also almost square, in contrast to S. terrestris sp. nov., where the shape of the areolae can be either almost square or rounded. The ends of the valves of the species M. dexterii are widely rounded; in S. terrestris sp. nov., the shape of the ends is more varied, from rostrate to widely rounded.
Microcostatus naumanii is similar to S. terrestris sp. nov. in its valve width (4–5 µm in M. naumanii vs 3.7–6.1 in S. terrestris sp. nov.). The main similarity of the discussed species was observed in the SEM. The areolae of both species are round to rectangular in shape. In both species, the raphe is located on a raised and slightly asymmetrical sternum; the orientation of the outer central and proximal raphe ends of the raphe is the same [41] (pp. 146–420), (Figure 3M,P,Q, Figure 4M,P and Figure 5M–O). Both species, M. naumanii [41] and S. terrestris sp. nov. (Figure 3M,N, Figure 4M,N and Figure 5M), have prominent longitudinal depressions widening towards the central part of the valves; the central area in both species is longitudinally lanceolate [41], (Figure 3N and Figure 4N). In addition, M. dexterii, some Sellaphora spp. (including S. terrestris sp. nov.), Okhapkinia alexanderi, and M. naumanii have one common structure: round apical pits at the apices of the valve ends [41] (Figure 3Q and Figure 4P,R). Van de Vijver et al. [41] indicated the presence of very weakly expressed microcostae in the material of M. naumanii [41]; while in Zidarova et al. [42], microcostae were not present in the same species.

3.2. Molecular Discussion

Molecular genetic data on freshwater representatives of Microcostatus are not available. At present, the 18S rRNA gene sequences of two strains of Microcostatus (MMDL 54701, MMDL 54702) from the intertidal zone of China have been deposited in GenBank. Unfortunately, the work has not yet been published, and there is no way to assess the morphological features of these taxa. Furthermore, to date, Microcostatus has been known only as a freshwater taxon, raising questions as to the identity of the diatoms from which the Chinese sequence data have been obtained. Despite this, the results of calculating the genetic distance for the site at V4 (Table 2) showed a high degree of difference. Thus, the sequences of strains differ from each other by 6.9% and most likely represent different species. In relation to the species S. terrestris sp. nov., the differences were 4.6% and 8.2%, respectively, which clearly demonstrates their isolated position. However, to understand the relationship between Microcostatus and Sellaphora, a phylogenetic analysis is required involving an additional set of genes (for example, rbcL, cox1), since the 18S rRNA analysis did not provide the necessary resolution. For accurate identification, it is necessary to study the morphology of these strains. Both genera, as currently circumscribed, possess a tremendous amount of morphological variation. For example, Liu et al. [45] recognized four groups differing in their morphological attributes, and one of them (their group B) is mainly represented by taxa in molecular analyses. All this, in our opinion, indicates the need to revise both genera: Microcostatus and Sellaphora. Given that the monophyletic clade containing “S. seminulum” was distinct from other Sellaphora species in both analyses, it may be prudent to reinvestigate whether the genus Eolimna should be recognized as distinct.
Studies using molecular approaches indicate a high genetic diversity of Sellaphora. Using the example of S. pupula, a number of studies have shown groups of representatives with minor morphometric differences form separate well-maintained genetic lines [6,9,14]. The results of crossing some taxa confirmed the existence of reproductive barriers for morphologically similar populations [13,19]. In studies concerning the detailed study of the morphological and cryptic diversity of Sellaphora, many representatives with unclear differences in morphology and with pronounced genetic isolation were considered as phenodemes or demes [6,9,14]. A detailed revision of the morphological, molecular, and crossbreeding data was carried out using the example of four species of S. americana (Ehrenberg) D.G. Mann, S. bacillum, S. pupula, and S. laevissima sensu Krammer and Lange-Bertalot [24] from 40 sites in Britain and Northern Ireland by Mann et al. [8]. As a result, 54 demes were proposed, which can be considered the starting point for further research into the intraspecific and interpopulation relationships of Sellaphora.
Molecular data are most fully summarized in Mann and Poulíčková [12], where a phylogenetic analysis of 67 strains was carried out based on a concatenated five-gene dataset (partial nuclear 18S rDNA and 28S rDNA, plastid 23S rDNA and rbcL, and mitochondrial cox1). The authors noted that the tree topology supported the results obtained in previous works based on a two-gene dataset [9] (18S rDNA and rbcL); [20] (cox1 and rbcL)) except for S. cf. minima (clone BM42), whose position in early studies was inside the S. pupula–S. bacillum complex. In the latest phylogeny of S. minima (TCC 524) and S. cf. minima (BM42), these strains form a separate clade next to the clade including S. laevissima (Figure 5) [12]. The results of the phylogenetic analysis by Mann and Poulíčková (Figure 5) [12] indicated that most strains are grouped into three clades named 1, 2, and 3: clades 1 and 3 include the taxa S. pupula sensu lato, and clade 2 includes strains of S. bacillum and several demes of S. pupula, characterized by the presence of conopeum (continuous across the central area or interrupted accordingly), while representatives of S. laevissima, S. seminulum, and S. minima are grouped into separate external branches.
Our phylogenetic analysis for the 18S rDNA and rbcL genes supports the clades 1–3 identified in previous works [9,12]. However, the clade size is much smaller, due to the lack of 18S rDNA gene sequence data for many strains. The outer clades “minima”, “seminulum”, and “laevissima” are also clearly differentiated with sufficient support values (Figure 7). It should be noted that the identification of these external clades was also observed in previous works. Thus, the clade with S. minima (strains BM42, TCC524) had the highest support (1.0 PP) in Mann and Poulíčková [12], the clade with S. laevissima (indicated as clade 4 in Evans et al. [9]; Poulíčková et al. [21]), regardless of the genes used, had a stable isolated phylogenetic position: 1.0 PP for 18S rDNA and rbcL analyses [8], 85 LB for cox1 and rbcL analyses [20], 0.99 PP for five-gene dataset (18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, 23S rDNA, rbcL, cox1) [11]. In our analysis, this clade is supplemented by S. balashovae.
A high level of support for the clade with S. seminulum was first shown by Mann and Poulíčková [12], where three strains were included in the analysis. In previous works [9,21], only one strain (TM37) was included, presumably assigned to this species. Notably, in all analyses, this species always represented a separate line (branch) next to S. laevissima (clade 4).
We performed a more complete phylogenetic analysis for the rbcL region, since the number of sequences in GenBank for this gene for Sellaphora is much larger. Our phylogenetic tree includes 106 strains of Sellaphora, the taxonomic epithets listed in GenBank have been changed to the names of demes or species proposed in the relevant works (listed in Supplementary Data S1). The general topology of the tree is consistent with that of previous works [9,12,20,21]. To designate subclades, we have used the numbers proposed by Evans and co-authors [9] and Mann and Poulíčková [12]. Clade 1A includes six demes of S. auldreekie, clade 1B of S. bisexualis, and several demes of S. pupula. Clade 2 in our phylogeny is expanded, due to a separate subclade, which includes six demes of S. pupula. Clade 3 retains high statistical support, includes many S. pupula demes, and strains of S. blackfordensis D.G. Mann and S. Droop and S. capitata are grouped into subclades. The fourth clade is formed by strains of S. laevissima and S. balashovae. The new basal clade has maximum support, which includes two clades: S. seminulum and a clade consisting of strains of the species S. terrestris sp. nov. The clade with S. minima was supplemented by the strain Sellaphora sp. Ak1876, recently isolated at Lake Toro, Sibecya, Hokkaido, Japan [46]. In general, according to the molecular genetic data of Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov., it was most similar to the species S. seminulum, S. laevissima, and S. balashovae (Figure 6 and Figure 7).
Thus, the morphological data and molecular genetic data indicate that our species belongs to the genus Sellaphora. The genus Microcostatus can currently be considered to require additional morphological and molecular genetic study of the species currently assigned to this genus.

4. Materials and Methods

Soil samples were collected from Cát Tiên National Park, Đồng Nai Province, Vietnam, by E.S. Gusev and E.M. Kezlya in June 2019. Sampling occurred during an expedition of the Joint Russian-Vietnamese Tropical Research and Technological Centre (the “Ecolan 3.2” Project). The National Park is located 150 km northeast of Hồ Chí Minh City. The region belongs to the bioclimatic type of monsoon tropical climate with summer rains, relative humidity almost always exceeding 70%, and average annual temperature of about 26 °C. The main part of the territory is occupied by forests, which are of the monsoon, semi-deciduous type [47].

4.1. Sample Collection Procedure

The samples were collected as follows: the surface of the test site was examined in order to detect macrogrowth of algae, then a composite sample was taken from an area of 10–30 m2. The composite sample consisted of 5–10 individual samples. For an individual sample, the topsoil was removed from an area of 5 to 20 cm2 with a metal scoop or shovel. After sampling, the instruments were cleaned and sterilized with ethanol. The samples were placed in labeled plastic zip bags and carried to the laboratory. The absolute humidity was measured immediately using the hot-drying method [48], and the samples were air-dried and packaged.

4.2. Soil Acidity Measurements

To measure pH, we mixed 30 g of soil with 150 mL of distilled water [49]. The suspension was poured into a clean glass beaker, and the measurements were performed with a Hanna Combo (HI 98129) device (Hanna Instruments, Inc., Woonsocket, RI, USA).

4.3. Culturing

Gathered materials were processed in the laboratory of molecular systematics of aquatic plants of the Institute of Plant Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IPP RAS). A sample of soil was thoroughly mixed and a small amount (15–20 g) was placed into a Petri dish (diameter 60 mm), then saturated with distilled water up to 60–80% of full moisture capacity and placed into an illuminated climate chamber. After a 10-day incubation period, the sample was diluted with a small amount of distilled water, mixed gently, and the suspension was transferred to a Petri dish for LM, using a Zeiss Axio Vert A1 inverted microscope. Algal cells were extracted with a micropipette, washed in 3–5 drops of sterile distilled water, and placed into a 300-µL well on a plate for enzyme-linked immunoassay with Waris-H+Si [50]. Non-axenic unialgal cultures were maintained at 22–25 °C in a growth chamber with a 12:12 h light:dark photoperiod. After 20 days, strains were re-inoculated to a Petri dish with liquid Waris-H+Si medium. The strains investigated here were designated VP272, VP299, VP303, and VP304 (see Table 4).
A list of all samples and strains examined in this study, with their GenBank accession numbers and geographic location of sampling sites, with measured ecological parameters is presented in Table 4. Terminology of the valve follows Kulikovskiy et al. [4], Mann et al. [8], Wetzel et al. [37], Van de Vijver et al. [41], and Stanek-Tarkowska et al. [43].

4.4. Preparation of Slides and Microscope Investigation

The monoclonal culture was boiled in 30% hydrogen peroxide at a temperature between 150–160 °C for 8 h, to dissolve organic matter. After decanting and refilling up to 50 mL with deionized water, the suspension was spread onto coverslips and left to dry at room temperature. Permanent diatom preparations were mounted in Naphrax® (refraction index = 1.73). LM observations were performed with a Zeiss Axio Scope A1 microscope equipped with an oil immersion objective (×100, n.a. 1.4, differential interference contrast) and Axio Cam ERc 5s camera. Valve ultrastructure was examined in Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters RAS, Borok, Russia, with a JSM-6510LV scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), operated at 10 kV and an 11-mm distance. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), parts of the suspensions were fixed on aluminum stubs after air-drying. The stubs were sputter coated with 50 nm of gold in an Eiko IB 3 (Eiko Engineering Co., Ltd, Ibaraki, Japan).

4.5. Molecular Investigation

The total DNA of the strains was obtained using ChelexTM 100 Chelating Resin, molecular biology grade (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol 2.2. Fragments of 18S rDNA gene (406–417 bp, including V4 domain), and partial rbcL plastid gene (951–957 bp) were amplified using the primers D512for and D978rev from Zimmerman et al. [51] for 18S rDNA fragments, and rbcL40+ from Ruck and Theriot [52] and rbcL1255 from Alverson et al. [53] for the rbcL gene. Amplifications of the 18S rDNA fragments and partial rbcL gene were carried out using the premade mix, ScreenMix (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia), for polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
The conditions of amplification for 18S rDNA fragments were as follows: an initial denaturation of 5 min at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for denaturation (30 s), 52 °C for annealing (30 s) and 72 °C for extension (50 s), and a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. The conditions of amplification for partial rbcL were an initial denaturation of 5 min at 95 °C, followed by 45 cycles at 94 °C for denaturation (30 s), 59 °C for annealing (30 s) and 72 °C for extension (80 s), and a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C.
The resulting amplicons were visualized using horizontal agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5%), colored with SYBR Safe (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Purification of DNA fragments was performed with an ExoSAP-IT kit (Affimetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. 18S rDNA fragments and partial rbcL gene were decoded from two sides, using forward and reverse PCR primers and the Big Dye system (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA), followed by electrophoresis using a Genetic Analyzer 3500 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA).
Editing and assembly of the consensus sequences were carried out by comparing the direct and reverse chromatograms using the Ridom TraceEdit program (ver. 1.1.0) and Mega7 [54].
With Mega7 software, the p-distance for 18S rDNA gene was determined and used to calculate the sequence similarity with the formula (1–p) ×100. Newly determined sequences and 18S rDNA gene and rbcL fragments from 39 other diatoms, which were downloaded from GenBank (taxa and Accession Numbers are given in the Supplementary Data S1), were used to generate two-gene trees (Supplementary Data S2). Since the 18S rDNA gene sequences are not available for the most Sellaphora strains, the rbcL reads were included in the alignments, along with corresponding sequences of 110 diatoms downloaded from GenBank (Supplementary Data S3). Three centric diatom species were chosen as the outgroups. The nucleotide sequences of the 18S rDNA and rbcL genes were aligned separately using Mafft v7 software and the E-INS-i model [55]. For the protein-coding sequences of the rbcL gene, we checked that the beginning of the aligned matrix corresponded to the first position of the codon (triplet). The resulting alignments had lengths of 404 (18S rDNA) and 957 (rbcL) characters. Two 18S rDNA gene sequences of the genus Microcostatus were used for the p-distance calculation.
The dataset was analyzed using the Bayesian interference (BI) method implemented in Beast ver.1.10.1 [56] for phylogeny reconstruction. For each of the alignment partitions, the most appropriate substitution model was estimated using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), as implemented in jModelTest 2.1.10 [57]. This BIC-based model selection procedure selected the following models, shape parameter α, and proportion of invariable sites (pinvar) for the concatenated tree: TIM3ef+I+G, α = 0.3800, and pinvar = 0.5940 for 18S rDNA gene; HKY+I, pinvar = 0.8430 for the first codon position of the rbcL gene; TVMef+I, pinvar = 0.9000 for the second codon position of the rbcL gene; and TPM3uf+G, α = 0.4070 for the third codon position of the rbcL gene. We used the HKY model of nucleotide substitution instead of TIM3ef and TPM3uf, and the GTR model instead of TVMef, since they were the best matching models available for BI. The following models, shape parameter α, and proportion of invariable sites were for the rbcL tree: HKY+I+G, α = 0.3370, and pinvar = 0.6700 for the first codon position of the rbcL gene; TrNef+I+G, α = 0.5340, and pinvar = 0.8280 for the second codon position of the rbcL gene; and TVM+I+G, α = 0.6170, and pinvar = 0.2080 for the third codon position of the rbcL gene. We used the HKY model of nucleotide substitution instead of TrNef, and the GTR model instead of TVM, for the individual rbcL tree.
A Yule process tree prior was used as a speciation model. The analysis ran for 5 million generations, with chain sampling every 100 generations. The parameters estimated convergence, effective sample size (ESS), and burn-in period were checked using the software Tracer ver. 1.7.1. [56]. The initial 25% of the trees were removed, and the rest were retqined to reconstruct a final phylogeny. The phylogenetic tree and posterior probabilities of its branching were obtained on the basis of the remaining trees, having stable estimates of the parameter models of nucleotide substitutions and likelihood. Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was performed using the program RA×ML [58]. The nonparametric bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates was used. The phylogenetic tree topologies are available online: Supplementary Data S4 for the concatenated rbcL and 18S rDNA genes tree and Supplementary Data S5 for the rbcL gene tree. The statistical support values were visualized in FigTree (ver. 1.4.2) and Adobe Photoshop CC (19.0).

5. Conclusions

We studied in detail the morphology of four soil strains of Sellaphora from Cát Tiên National Park and identified a number of differences from all currently known species. During the study of cultured and natural materials, variability of morphometric characteristics (length and width of valves, density of striae) was revealed, while molecular studies on rbcL and 18S rDNA genes including the V4 domain showed that the strains studied by us formed a separate branch, with high statistical support. Based on these data, we described the new for science species Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. In addition, we noticed that some species assigned to Microcostatus J.R. Johansen and J.C. Sray have a very similar morphology to our new species. The results of the study of the morphological characteristics of a number of species of Sellaphora and Microcostatus indicated that many characteristics (robustness of microcostae, striae morphology, and presence of conopeum and hymenes) can be expressed to varying degrees. We cannot exclude the possibility that some species assigned to the genus Microcostatus do not belong there, and may be better placed within Sellaphora. Molecular genetic data for Microcostatus are limited and require further study.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11162148/s1, Data S1: Taxa and DNA sequence data used in phylogenetic analysis (.docx format), Data S2: Alignment file of 43 concatenated rbcL, 18S rDNA genes sequences of Sellaphoraceae (.fas format), Data S3: Alignment file of 114 rbcL gene sequences of Sellaphoraceae (.fas format), Data S4: The topology of the concatenated rbcL, 18S rDNA genes Bayesian phylogenetic tree (.txt format), Data S5: The topology of the rbcL gene Bayesian phylogenetic tree (.txt format).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K.; methodology, A.G., E.K. and Y.M.; validation, A.G., M.K. and J.P.K.; investigation, A.G., M.K., J.P.K. and Y.M.; resources, M.K. and Y.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G., M.K., E.K. and Y.M.; writing—review and editing, A.G., E.K., M.K. and J.P.K.; visualization, S.G. and A.G.; supervision, M.K.; funding acquisition, M.K. and A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Isolation, cultivation and molecular analysis were obtained with financial support from the Russian Science Foundation (project number 19-14-00320П). Light and scanning electronic microscopies, and finishing the manuscript were obtained within the state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (theme no. 122042700045-3).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Mereschkowsky, C. On Sellaphora, a new genus of diatoms. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 1902, 9, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. AlgaeBase; World-Wide Electronic Publication; National University of Ireland: Galway, Ireland, 2022; Available online: http://www.algaebase.org (accessed on 1 August 2022).
  3. Kociolek, J.P.; Blanco, S.; Coste, M.; Ector, L.; Liu, Y.; Karthick, B.; Kulikovskiy, M.; Lundholm, N.; Ludwig, T.; Potapova, M.; et al. DiatomBase. Available online: https://www.diatombase.org (accessed on 1 August 2022).
  4. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Glushchenko, A.M.; Genkal, S.I.; Kuznetsova, I.V. Identification Book of Diatoms from Russia; Filigran: Yaroslavl, Russia, 2016; 804p. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Glushchenko, A.M.; Kuznetsova, I.V.; Kociolek, J.P. Description of the new freshwater diatom genus Okhapkinia gen. nov. from Laos (Southeast Asia), with notes on family Sellaphoraceae Mereschkowsky1902. Fottea 2018, 18, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mann, D.G.; Chepurnov, V.A.; Droop, S.J.M. Sexuality, incompatibility, size variation, and preferential polyandry in natural populations and clones of Sellaphora pupula (Bacillariophyceae). J. Phycol. 1999, 35, 152–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mann, D.G.; McDonald, S.M.; Bayer, M.M.; Droop, S.J.M.; Chepurnov, V.A.; Loke, R.E.; Ciobanu, A.; du Buf, J.M.H. The Sellaphora pupula species complex (Bacillariophyceae): Morphometric analysis, ultrastructure and mating data provide evidence for five new species. Phycologia 2004, 43, 459–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mann, D.G.; Thomas, S.J.; Evans, K.M. Revision of the diatom genus Sellaphora: A first account of the larger species in the British Isles. Fottea 2008, 8, 15–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Evans, K.M.; Wortley, A.H.; Simpson, G.E.; Chepurnov, V.A.; Mann, D.G. A molecular systematic approach to explore diversity within the Sellaphora pupula species complex (Bacillariophyta). J. Phycol. 2008, 44, 215–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mann, D.G.; Stickle, A.S. Cytological characteristics of the Sellaphoraceae. Acta Bot. Croat. 2009, 68, 239–250. [Google Scholar]
  11. Andreeva, S.; Kociolek, J.P.; Maltsev, Y.; Dorofeyuk, N.; Kezlya, E.; Shkurina, N.; Kuznetsova, I.; Gusev, E.; Kulikovskiy, M.S. Sellaphora balashovae (Bacillariophyta), a new species from Siberian mountain Lake Frolikha (Baikal region), Russia. Phytotaxa 2018, 371, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mann, D.G.; Poulíčková, A. Homothallism, morphology and phylogenetic position of a new species of Sellaphora (Bacillariophyta), S. pausariae. Plant Ecol. Evol. 2019, 152, 203–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Behnke, A.; Friedl, T.; Chepurnov, V.A.; Mann, D.G. Reproductive compatibility and rDNA sequence analyses in the Sellaphora pupula species complex (Bacillariophyta). J. Phycol. 2004, 40, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Evans, K.M.; Wortley, A.H.; Mann, D.G. An assessment of potential diatom ‘‘barcode’’ genes (cox1, rbcL, 18S and ITS rDNA) and their effectiveness in determining relationships in Sellaphora (Bacillariophyta). Protist 2007, 158, 349–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Evans, K.M.; Chepurnov, V.A.; Sluiman, H.J.; Thomas, S.J.; Spears, B.M.; Mann, D.G. Highly differentiated populations of the freshwater diatom Sellaphora capitata suggest limited dispersal and opportunities for allopatric speciation. Protist 2009, 160, 386–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mann, D.G. The species concept in diatoms: Evidence for morphologically distinct, sympatric gamodemes in four epipelic species. Plant Syst. Evol. 1989, 164, 215–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hustedt, F. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz unter Berücksichtigung der übrigen Lånder Europas Sowie der Angrenzenden Meeresgebiete. In Österreich und der Schweiz 7 (3:1); von Deutschland, R.K., Ed.; Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft: Leipzig, Germany, 1961; pp. 1–160. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ross, R. The diatom genus Capartogramma and the identity of Schizostauron. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Bot. 1963, 3, 47–92. [Google Scholar]
  19. VanLandingham, S.L. Catalogue of the Fossil and Recent Genera and Species of Diatoms and Their Synonyms. Part 5: Navicula; J. Cramer: Vaduz, Liechtenstein, 1975; pp. 386–963. [Google Scholar]
  20. Vanormelingen, P.; Evans, K.M.; Chepurnov, V.A.; Vyverman, W.; Mann, D.G. Molecular species discovery in the diatom Sellaphora and its congruence with mating trials. Fottea 2013, 13, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Poulíčková, A.; Sato, S.; Evans, K.M.; Chepurnov, V.A.; Mann, D.G. Repeated evolution of uniparental reproduction in Sellaphora (Bacillariophyceae). Eur. J. Phycol. 2015, 50, 62–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hamsher, S.E.; Evans, K.; Mann, D.G.; Poulíčková, A.; Saunders, G.W. Barcoding Diatoms: Exploring Alternatives to COI-5P. Protist 2011, 162, 405–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hustedt, F. Bacillariophyta (Diatomeae). In Die Süsswasser-Flora Mitteleuropas. Zweite Auflage. Heft 10; Pascher, A., Ed.; Gustav Fischer: Jena, Germany, 1930; 466p. [Google Scholar]
  24. Krammer, K.; Lange-Bertalot, H. Bacillariophyceae 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. In Süβwasserflora von Mitteleuropa; Ettl, H., Gerloff, J., Heynig, H., Mollenhauer, D., Eds.; Gustav Fischer: Stuttgart, Germany, 1986; Volume 2, 876p. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mann, D.G. Observations on copulation in Navicula pupula and Amphora ovalis in relation to the nature of diatom species. Ann. Bot. 1984, 54, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mann, D.G.; Evans, K.M.; Chepurnov, V.A.; Nagai, S. Morphology and formal description of Sellaphora bisexualis sp. nov. (Bacillariophyta). Fottea 2009, 9, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wetzel, C.E.; Barragán, C.; Ector, L. Sellaphora lundii nom. et stat. nov. (Bacillariophyta), a forgotten European terrestrial species. Not. Algarum 2017, 38, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  28. Foets, J.; Wetzel, C.E. Sellaphora harderi (Hustedt) comb. nov. (Bacillariophyta, Sellaphoraceae), an overlooked terrestrial diatom. Not. Algarum 2018, 52, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kuehnle, A.; Schurr, R.; Perez, M. Some Microalgae from the Hawaiian Islands with a Focus on Industrial Applications. Curr. Biotechnol. 2015, 4, 499–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Malavasi, V.; Škaloud, P.; Rindi, F.; Tempesta, S.; Paoletti, M.; Pasqualetti, M. DNA-based taxonomy in ecologically versatile microalgae: A re-evaluation of the species concept within the coccoid green algal genus Coccomyxa (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0151137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kezlya, E.M.; Glushchenko, A.M.; Maltsev, Y.I.; Maltseva, S.Y.; Gusev, E.S.; Kulikovskiy, M.S. Composition and structure algal Community of the Cát Tiên National Park, southern Vietnam (first data). Issues Mod. Algol. 2021, 2, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kezlya, E.M.; Glushchenko, A.M.; Kociolek, J.P.; Maltsev, Y.I.; Martynenko, N.A.; Genkal, S.I.; Kulikovskiy, M.S. Mayamaea vietnamica sp. nov.: A new, terrestrial diatom (Bacillariophyceae) species from Vietnam. Algae 2020, 35, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kezlya, E.M.; Glushchenko, A.M.; Maltsev, Y.I.; Gusev, E.S.; Genkal, S.I.; Kuznetsov, A.N.; Kociolek, J.P.; Kulikovskiy, M.S. Placoneis cattiensis sp. nov.—A new, diatom (Bacillariophyceae: Cymbellales) soil species from Cát Tiên National Park (Vietnam). Phytotaxa 2020, 460, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Falasco, E.; Blanco, S.; Bona, F.; Goma, J.; Hlubikova, D.; Novais, M.H.; Hoffmann, L.; Ector, L. Taxonomy, morphology and distribution of the Sellaphora stroemii complex (Bacillariophyceae). Fottea 2009, 9, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tuji, A. Freshwater diatom flora in the bottom sediments of Lake Biwa (South Basin): Navicula sensu lato. Bull. Natl. Sci. Mus. Tokyo Ser. B Bot. 2003, 29, 65–82. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hustedt, F. Systematische und ökologische Untersuchungen über die Diatomeen-Flora von Java, Bali und Sumatra nach dem Material der Deutschen Limnologischen Sunda-Expedition “Tropische Binnengewässer, Band VII”. Arch. Für Hydrobiol. Suppl. 1937, 15, 187–295. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wetzel, C.E.; Ector, L.; Van de Vijver, B.; Compère, P.; Mann, D.G. Morphology, typification and critical analysis of some ecologically important small naviculoid species (Bacillariophyta). Fottea 2015, 15, 203–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cantonati, M.; Kelly, M.G.; Lange-Bertalot, H. Freshwater Benthic Diatoms of Central Europe: Over 800 Common Species Used in Ecological Assessment; Koeltz Botanical Books: Königstein, Germany, 2017; 942p. [Google Scholar]
  39. Heudre, D.; Wetzel, C.E.; Moreau, L.; Ector, L. Sellaphora davoutiana sp. nov.: A new freshwater diatom species (Sellaphoraceae, Bacillariophyta) in lakes of Northeastern France. Phytotaxa 2018, 346, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lund, J.W.G. Observations on soil algae I. The ecology, size and taxonomy of British soil diatoms. Part 2. New Phytol. 1946, 45, 56–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Van de Vijver, B.; Ector, L.; Haan, M.; Zidarova, R. The genus Microcostatus in the Antarctic region. Diatom Res. 2010, 25, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zidarova, R.; Kopalová, K.; Van de Vijver, B. Diatoms from the Antarctic Region: Maritime Antarctica. Iconogr. Diatomol. 2016, 24, 1–504. [Google Scholar]
  43. Stanek-Tarkowska, J.; Czyz, E.A.; Rybak, M. Description of a new diatom species—Microcostatus dexteri sp. nov.—From terrestrial habitats in southern Poland. Phytotaxa 2021, 509, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Johansen, J.R.; Sray, J.C. Microcostatus gen. nov., a new aerophilic diatom genus based on Navicula krasskei Hustedt. Diatom Res. 1998, 13, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, Y.; Kociolek, J.P.; Lu, X.; Fan, Y. A new Sellaphora Mereschkowsky species (Bacillariophyceae) from Hainan Island, China, with comments on the current state of the taxonomy and morphology of the genus. Diatom Res. 2020, 35, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tuji, A.; Suzuki, S.; Yamagishi, T.; Yamaguchi, H. Alternative Diatom Strains for Growth Inhibition Tests (OECD Test Guideline 201). Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci. Ser. B Bot. 2021, 47, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Blanc, L.; Maury-Lechon, G.; Pascal, J.-P. Structure, floristic composition and natural regeneration in the forests of Cat Tien National Park, Vietnam: An analysis of the successional trends. J. Biogeogr. 2001, 27, 141–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vadjunina, A.F.; Korchagina, Z.A. Methods of Studying the Physical Properties of Soils; Agropromisdat: Moscow, Russia, 1986; 416p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  49. Arinushkina, E.W. Handbook for Chemical Soil Analysis; Publishing Moscow State University: Moscow, Russia, 1970; 488p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  50. McFadden, G.I.; Melkonian, M. Use of Hepes buffer for microalgal culture media and fixation for electron microscopy. Phycologia 1986, 25, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zimmermann, J.; Jahn, R.; Gemeinholzer, B. Barcoding diatoms: Evaluation of the V4 subregion on the 18S rRNA gene, including new primers and protocols. Org. Divers. Evol. 2011, 11, 173–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ruck, E.C.; Theriot, E.C. Origin and evolution of the canal raphe system in diatoms. Protist 2011, 162, 723–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Alverson, A.J.; Jansen, R.K.; Theriot, E.C. Bridging the Rubicon: Phylogenetic analysis reveals repeated colonization’s of marine and fresh waters by thalassiosiroid diatoms. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 45, 193–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Katoh, K.; Toh, H. Parallelization of the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 1899–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Drummond, A.J.; Rambaut, A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Darriba, D.; Taboada, G.L.; Doallo, R.; Posada, D. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Met. 2012, 9, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Stamatakis, A.; Hoover, P.; Rougemont, J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57, 758–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 11 02148 g001 550
Figure 1. Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. Strain VP 304. Slide no. 07062a. (A–L). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series (M). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (M–O). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (P–R). Black arrow shows the longitudinal grooves in the axial area. White arrows show the distal raphe ends. White arrowhead shows the conopeum. (N). Black arrow shows the proximal raphe ends. White arrowhead shows the conopeum. (O). White arrows show the distal raphe end. (P). Black arrow shows the axial area. Black arrowheads show the helictoglossae. White arrowheads show the central raphe ends. (Q). Black arrows show the rounded apical pits. White arrow shows the areolae covered by hymenes (R). Black arrowhead shows the helictoglossa. (G). Holotype. Scale bar (A–L) = 10 μm; (M,P,Q) = 2 μm; (N) = 1 μm; (O,R) = 0.5 μm.
Figure 1. Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. Strain VP 304. Slide no. 07062a. (A–L). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series (M). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (M–O). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (P–R). Black arrow shows the longitudinal grooves in the axial area. White arrows show the distal raphe ends. White arrowhead shows the conopeum. (N). Black arrow shows the proximal raphe ends. White arrowhead shows the conopeum. (O). White arrows show the distal raphe end. (P). Black arrow shows the axial area. Black arrowheads show the helictoglossae. White arrowheads show the central raphe ends. (Q). Black arrows show the rounded apical pits. White arrow shows the areolae covered by hymenes (R). Black arrowhead shows the helictoglossa. (G). Holotype. Scale bar (A–L) = 10 μm; (M,P,Q) = 2 μm; (N) = 1 μm; (O,R) = 0.5 μm.
Plants 11 02148 g001
Plants 11 02148 g002 550
Figure 2. Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. Strain VP 272. Slide no. 07030. (A–L). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series (M–O). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (P–R). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (M). Black arrow shows the longitudinal grooves in the axial area. White arrowhead shows the raphe. (N). Black arrow shows the proximal raphe ends. White arrowhead shows the conopeum. (P). Black arrow shows the rounded apical pit. (Q). White arrowhead shows the helictoglossa. (R). Black arrow shows the rounded apical pit. Scale bar (A–L) = 10 μm; (Q) = 2 μm; (M,O,P) = 1 μm; (N,R,S) = 0.5 μm.
Figure 2. Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. Strain VP 272. Slide no. 07030. (A–L). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series (M–O). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (P–R). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (M). Black arrow shows the longitudinal grooves in the axial area. White arrowhead shows the raphe. (N). Black arrow shows the proximal raphe ends. White arrowhead shows the conopeum. (P). Black arrow shows the rounded apical pit. (Q). White arrowhead shows the helictoglossa. (R). Black arrow shows the rounded apical pit. Scale bar (A–L) = 10 μm; (Q) = 2 μm; (M,O,P) = 1 μm; (N,R,S) = 0.5 μm.
Plants 11 02148 g002
Plants 11 02148 g003 550
Figure 3. Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. Strain VP 303. Slide no. 07061. (A–L). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series (M). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (N–P). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (M). Black arrow shows the longitudinal grooves in the axial area. White arrows show the distal raphe end. (N). White arrows show the striae. (O). Black arrow shows the axial area. Scale bar (A–L) = 10 μm; (M–O) = 2 μm; (P) = 1 μm.
Figure 3. Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. Strain VP 303. Slide no. 07061. (A–L). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series (M). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (N–P). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (M). Black arrow shows the longitudinal grooves in the axial area. White arrows show the distal raphe end. (N). White arrows show the striae. (O). Black arrow shows the axial area. Scale bar (A–L) = 10 μm; (M–O) = 2 μm; (P) = 1 μm.
Plants 11 02148 g003
Plants 11 02148 g004 550
Figure 4. Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. Strain VP 299. Slide no. 07057. (A–L). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series (M–O). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. Black arrowheads show the helictoglossae. White arrowheads show the central raphe ends. Scale bar (A–L) = 10 μm; (Q) = 2 μm; (M–O) = 1 μm.
Figure 4. Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. Strain VP 299. Slide no. 07057. (A–L). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series (M–O). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. Black arrowheads show the helictoglossae. White arrowheads show the central raphe ends. Scale bar (A–L) = 10 μm; (Q) = 2 μm; (M–O) = 1 μm.
Plants 11 02148 g004
Plants 11 02148 g005 550
Figure 5. Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Samples of wild populations. (A–G). Sample Kt33. Slide no 07223. (H–N). Sample Kt59. Slide no 06989. (O–U). Sample Kt60. Slide no 07232. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Figure 5. Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Samples of wild populations. (A–G). Sample Kt33. Slide no 07223. (H–N). Sample Kt59. Slide no 06989. (O–U). Sample Kt60. Slide no 07232. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Plants 11 02148 g005
Plants 11 02148 g006 550
Figure 6. Phylogenetic position of Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. (indicated in bold) within the Sellaphoraceae based on Bayesian inference for the 114 partial rbcL gene. The total length of the alignment is 957 characters. Values above the horizontal lines are bootstrap support the from ML analyses (<50 are not shown); values below the horizontal lines (or to the right of the slash) are Bayesian posterior probabilities (<0.9 are not shown). Strain numbers (if available) are indicated for all sequences. Clades indicated sensu Evans et al. [9], and Mann and Poulíčková [12] are in bold.
Figure 6. Phylogenetic position of Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. (indicated in bold) within the Sellaphoraceae based on Bayesian inference for the 114 partial rbcL gene. The total length of the alignment is 957 characters. Values above the horizontal lines are bootstrap support the from ML analyses (<50 are not shown); values below the horizontal lines (or to the right of the slash) are Bayesian posterior probabilities (<0.9 are not shown). Strain numbers (if available) are indicated for all sequences. Clades indicated sensu Evans et al. [9], and Mann and Poulíčková [12] are in bold.
Plants 11 02148 g006
Plants 11 02148 g007 550
Figure 7. Phylogenetic position of Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. (indicated in bold) within the Sellaphoraceae based on Bayesian inference for a concatenated alignment of 43 partial rbcL and partial 18S rDNA sequences. The total length of the alignment was 1361 characters. Values above the horizontal lines are bootstrap support from ML analyses (<50 are not shown); values below the horizontal lines (or to the right of the slash) are Bayesian posterior probabilities (<0.9 are not shown). Strain numbers (if available) are indicated for all sequences. Clades indicated sensu Evans et al. [9], and Mann and Poulíčková [12] are at the right.
Figure 7. Phylogenetic position of Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. (indicated in bold) within the Sellaphoraceae based on Bayesian inference for a concatenated alignment of 43 partial rbcL and partial 18S rDNA sequences. The total length of the alignment was 1361 characters. Values above the horizontal lines are bootstrap support from ML analyses (<50 are not shown); values below the horizontal lines (or to the right of the slash) are Bayesian posterior probabilities (<0.9 are not shown). Strain numbers (if available) are indicated for all sequences. Clades indicated sensu Evans et al. [9], and Mann and Poulíčková [12] are at the right.
Plants 11 02148 g007
Table
Table 1. Comparison of morphological characteristics of wild populations and cultures of S. terrestris sp. nov.
Table 1. Comparison of morphological characteristics of wild populations and cultures of S. terrestris sp. nov.
Wild PopulationCulture
Sample Kt 33Sample Kt 59Sample Kt 60Strain VP 272Strain VP 299Strain VP 303Strain VP 304
Outlinelinear-lanceolate, linear-elliptical to ellipticallinear-lanceolate, linear-elliptical to ellipticallinear-elliptical to ellipticallinear-elliptical to ellipticalellipticallinear-ellipticallinear-elliptical
Endsshort rostrate to broadly roundedshort rostrate to broadly roundedshort rostrate to broadly roundedrostrateshort rostrate to broadly roundedrostraterostrate
Axial areanarrownarrownarrownarrownarrownarrownarrow
Central areasmall, ellipticalsmall, ellipticalsmall, ellipticalsmall, ellipticalsmall, ellipticalsmall, ellipticalsmall, elliptical
Valve length (μm)9.1–17.1
(11.7 ± 2.4; n = 22)		8.2–16.9
(12.3 ± 2.3; n = 22)		6.9–13.4
(9.5 ± 1.4; n = 22)		10.4–13.9 (11.7 ± 0.8;
n = 22)		5.2–6.3 (5.5 ± 0.2; n = 21)13.2–14.0 (13.5 ± 0.2;
n = 23)		13.4–14.3 (13.8 ± 0.2;
n = 24)
Valve width (μm)4.5–6.1
(4.9 ± 0.4; n = 22)		4.2–5.0
(4.5 ± 0.2; n = 22)		4.3–5.0
(4.4 ± 0.2; n = 22)		4.5–4.9
(4.7 ± 0.1;
n = 22)		3.7–4.0 (3.8 ± 0.05; n = 21)4.7–4.9
(4.8 ± 0.03;
n = 23)		4.6–5.1
(4.8 ± 0.1;
n = 24)
Striae, in 10 μm29–32
(28.6 ± 1.3; n = 22)		30–31
(30.1 ± 0.3; n = 22)		29–31
(29.9 ± 0.4; n = 22)		29–30
(29.9 ± 0.2;
n = 22)		30–34
(32 ± 0.7;
n = 21)		28–32
(30 ± 0.6;
n = 23)		30–35
(32.1 ± 0.9;
n = 24)
Areolae----ca. 65ca. 60ca. 60
Table
Table 2. Percentage similarity (p-distance) matrix of 20 strains on the basis of the partial 18S rRNA gene (401 bp).
Table 2. Percentage similarity (p-distance) matrix of 20 strains on the basis of the partial 18S rRNA gene (401 bp).
Strain1234567891011121314151617181920
1Sellaphora terrestris VP304–
2Microcostatus sp. MMDL 5470295.4–
3Microcostatus sp. MMDL 5470191.892.9–
4Sellaphora auldreekie DUN1 clade_1A96.494.490.8–
5Sellaphora pupula agg. “large” THR11 clade 1B95.795.290.897.7–
6Sellaphora bisexualis RBG1 clade 1B95.995.491.198.099.8–
7Sellaphora lanceolata BLA13 clade 2A96.494.490.097.496.796.9–
8Sellaphora bacillum BLA3 clade 2A96.795.290.897.797.097.299.2–
9Sellaphora pupula agg. “little” RBG clade 2B95.495.491.197.599.599.896.496.7–
10Sellaphora pupula agg. “small capitate” DUN7 clade 2B95.995.491.198.099.899.797.297.599.5–
11Sellaphora blackfordensis BLA6 clade 395.995.190.897.997.297.497.297.796.997.4–
12Sellaphora pupula agg. cf. obesa BEL2 clade 395.494.990.597.296.997.296.496.996.797.299.2–
13Sellaphora balashovae SvA-2018a B38596.795.791.396.996.496.796.797.296.296.796.996.2–
14Sellaphora sp. KEL-2015 JAR35 4FRun695.994.690.397.496.997.296.797.296.797.298.597.796.9–
15Sellaphora minima TCC52496.293.990.895.995.295.495.495.795.495.494.994.195.794.9–
16Sellaphora laevissima THR497.296.791.896.997.297.497.297.796.997.498.097.498.598.095.9–
17Sellaphora laevissima THR196.495.991.196.296.496.796.496.996.296.797.296.797.797.294.999.2–
18Sellaphora seminulum HYU-D01494.992.689.095.294.494.695.995.994.294.994.994.294.993.993.794.994.7–
19Sellaphora seminulum TCC46194.193.489.093.693.994.193.693.693.694.494.193.994.193.693.995.494.695.7–
20Sellaphora cf. seminulum TM3795.994.490.896.796.296.496.797.096.496.496.595.796.995.495.496.495.796.794.7–
Table
Table 3. Comparison of Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. with similar species of Sellaphora and Microcostatus.
Table 3. Comparison of Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. with similar species of Sellaphora and Microcostatus.
OutlineEndsAxial AreaCentral AreaValve Length (μm)Valve Width (μm)Striae in 10 μmAreolae in 10 μmDistributionReferences
Sellaphora
terrestris sp. nov.		linear-elliptical to elliptical with weakly convex marginsshort rostrate to broadly roundednarrow, weakly extended to the central areasmall, longitudinally lanceolate6.9–17.13.7–6.128–3560–65Vietnam, Cát Tiên National ParkThis study
S. laevissimalinear, usually with weakly convex margins in the centreeither very weakly protracted, subcapitate or not protracted, always broadly roundednarrow, not or very little broadened towards the centredistinct, more or less transversely rectangular, extends over 50–60% of the valve width, rarely more22–507–1115–2130–35Holarctic[38]
S. balashovaeellipticsubcapitatenarrow, weakly extended to the central areabow-tie-shaped, bordered by alternating short and long striae11–1443060Russia, Lake Frolikha [11]
S. seminulumlinear–lanceolate to broadly lanceolate with clearly convex margins (inflated in the middle)protracted, broadly rounded, slightly rostratelinear–lanceolate, with an irregular border, and is central or apparently very slightly displaced towards the secondary sidebordered by three shorter striae and is usually butterfly–shaped, but the size and shape vary5.0–16.53.0–4.518–20>30Holarctic[37,38]
S. davoutianaelliptic-lanceolatebroadly protracted, subcapitate and roundednarrow, linear and slightly widened toward central areasmall and elliptical to rectangular with 2 or 3 slightly shortened striae of varying length on either side28–354.0–4.926–3060–70France. Grand Est region. La Bresse: Lispach Lake[39]
S. lundiielliptical, are centrally inflatedrostrate to weakly capitatenarrow, linearclearly marked, rectangular to oblong9–134–523–2855–60 *England, UK, Selly Oak, Birmingham.
Allotment; Belgium, Luxembourg		[27,40]
Microcostatus naumaniielliptic-lanceolate to lanceolate with clearly convex marginsin smaller specimens, apices tend to be more rostrate, whereas larger valves have protracted, capitate endsvery narrow near the valve apices but forming two longitudinal depressions, abruptly and elliptically enlarged towards the central areaalmost elliptical9.5–15.54–524–26c.a. 60 *Sweden,
Macedonia,
Norway, Finland, Victoria Island, Scotland, Patagonia (Argentina), South Shetland Islands (Deception Island, King George Island and Livingston
Island), Antarctic Continent		[41,42]
Microcostatus dexteriilanceolate to elliptical-lanceolateroundednarrowing near the valve apices, forming two longitudinal depressions, enlarged in the middle and creating an central areaalmost lanceolate6.6–16.42.3–5.520–2445–50 *Poland.
Podkarpacie
Province, Rzeszów, soils		[43]
* counted by us from published data.
Table
Table 4. List of strains examined in this study, with their GenBank accession numbers. Geographic locality of samples and measured ecological parameters are indicated.
Table 4. List of strains examined in this study, with their GenBank accession numbers. Geographic locality of samples and measured ecological parameters are indicated.
StrainsSlide NoSample NoSample LocalityCollection of DateCollection SitepHTotal Humidity (%)GenBank Accession Number, SSU rDNA, PartialGenBank Accession Number, rbcL, Partial
Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. VP 27207030Kt33Southeast Vietnam,
Cat Tien National Park		25 June 201211°25.019′ N
107°25.545′ E
Forest soil surface		6.048.97ON332054ON350763
Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. VP 29907057Kt60Southeast Vietnam,
Cat Tien National Park 		25 June 201911°24.247′ N
107°23.661′ E
Agricultural field soil surface 		4.5827.9ON332055ON350764
Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. VP 30307061Kt59Southeast Vietnam,
Cat Tien National Park 		25 June 201911°24.241′ N
107°22.468′ E
Agricultural field soil surface 		5.2236ON332056ON350765
Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. VP 30407062aKt59Southeast Vietnam,
Cat Tien National Park 		25 June 201911°24.241′ N
107°22.468′ E
Agricultural field soil surface		5.2236ON332057ON350766
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Glushchenko, A.; Kezlya, E.; Maltsev, Y.; Genkal, S.; Kociolek, J.P.; Kulikovskiy, M. Description of the Soil Diatom Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. (Bacillariophyceae, Sellaphoraceae) from Vietnam, with Remarks on the Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Sellaphora and Systematic Position of Microcostatus. Plants 2022, 11, 2148. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162148

AMA Style

Glushchenko A, Kezlya E, Maltsev Y, Genkal S, Kociolek JP, Kulikovskiy M. Description of the Soil Diatom Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. (Bacillariophyceae, Sellaphoraceae) from Vietnam, with Remarks on the Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Sellaphora and Systematic Position of Microcostatus. Plants. 2022; 11(16):2148. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162148

Chicago/Turabian Style

Glushchenko, Anton, Elena Kezlya, Yevhen Maltsev, Sergei Genkal, John Patrick Kociolek, and Maxim Kulikovskiy. 2022. "Description of the Soil Diatom Sellaphora terrestris sp. nov. (Bacillariophyceae, Sellaphoraceae) from Vietnam, with Remarks on the Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Sellaphora and Systematic Position of Microcostatus" Plants 11, no. 16: 2148. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162148

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop