Connect with us

Politics

Mapped: The Age of U.S. Senators, by State

Published

on

Mapped: The Age of U.S. Senators, by State

Mapped: The Age of U.S. Senators, by State

The passing of California Senator Dianne Feinstein at the age of 90 is throwing a spotlight on America’s political establishment, not only with the government narrowly escaping shutdown, but on questions of ageism, representation, and fitness for office.

Feinstein had a noteworthy career. As the longest-running woman in the Senate’s history, she served the nation’s most populous state.

Yet Feinstein’s growing health complications along with two incidents of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell freezing while speaking this year highlight the growing trend of America’s aging leadership.

The above graphic shows the age of U.S. senators, by state as of October 5, 2023.

How the Age of U.S. Senators Breaks Down

Today, 66% of senators are over the age of 60.

While senators have historically been older than the American population, consider how the median age in the U.S. is 39 according to the 2020 U.S. Census, and the median age of the Senate prior to Feinstein’s passing was 65.

We can see in the below table how the Senate has become growingly older, influenced by longer lifespans and the increased likelihood of members running for re-election (and winning). In addition, members in the Baby Boomer generation, ages 58 to 77 years old, often have more resources and wealth to help secure their seat.

NameSenator AgeStateParty
Grassley, Chuck90IowaRepublican
Sanders, Bernard82VermontIndependent
McConnell, Mitch81KentuckyRepublican
Risch, James E.80IdahoRepublican
Cardin, Benjamin L.80MarylandDemocratic
King, Angus S., Jr.79MaineIndependent
Durbin, Richard J.78IllinoisDemocratic
Blumenthal, Richard77ConnecticutDemocratic
Markey, Edward J.77MassachusettsDemocratic
Carper, Thomas R.76DelawareDemocratic
Shaheen, Jeanne76New HampshireDemocratic
Welch, Peter76VermontDemocratic
Manchin, Joe, III76West VirginiaDemocratic
Romney, Mitt76UtahRepublican
Hirono, Mazie K.75HawaiiDemocratic
Warren, Elizabeth74MassachusettsDemocratic
Wyden, Ron74OregonDemocratic
Stabenow, Debbie73MichiganDemocratic
Reed, Jack73Rhode IslandDemocratic
Schumer, Charles E.72New YorkDemocratic
Murray, Patty72WashingtonDemocratic
Boozman, John72ArkansasRepublican
Crapo, Mike72IdahoRepublican
Wicker, Roger F.72MississippiRepublican
Fischer, Deb72NebraskaRepublican
Hickenlooper,
John W.
71ColoradoDemocratic
Kennedy, John71LouisianaRepublican
Blackburn, Marsha71TennesseeRepublican
Cornyn, John71TexasRepublican
Barrasso, John71WyomingRepublican
Brown, Sherrod70OhioDemocratic
Scott, Rick70FloridaRepublican
Collins, Susan M.70MaineRepublican
Menendez, Robert69New JerseyDemocratic
Tuberville, Tommy69AlabamaRepublican
Braun, Mike69IndianaRepublican
Moran, Jerry69KansasRepublican
Capito,
Shelley Moore
69West VirginiaRepublican
Lummis, Cynthia M.69WyomingRepublican
Warner, Mark R.68VirginiaDemocratic
Graham, Lindsey68South CarolinaRepublican
Rounds, Mike68South DakotaRepublican
Johnson, Ron68WisconsinRepublican
Tester, Jon67MontanaDemocratic
Whitehouse, Sheldon67Rhode IslandDemocratic
Rosen, Jacky66NevadaDemocratic
Merkley, Jeff66OregonDemocratic
Murkowski, Lisa66AlaskaRepublican
Hoeven, John66North DakotaRepublican
Cassidy, Bill66LouisianaRepublican
Smith, Tina65MinnesotaDemocratic
Hassan,
Margaret Wood
65New HampshireDemocratic
Kaine, Tim65VirginiaDemocratic
Van Hollen, Chris64MarylandDemocratic
Peters, Gary C.64MichiganDemocratic
Cantwell, Maria64WashingtonDemocratic
Hyde-Smith, Cindy64MississippiRepublican
Hagerty, Bill64TennesseeRepublican
Klobuchar, Amy63MinnesotaDemocratic
Casey,
Robert P., Jr.
63PennsylvaniaDemocratic
Marshall, Roger63KansasRepublican
Tillis, Thom63North CarolinaRepublican
Cramer, Kevin62North DakotaRepublican
Thune, John62South DakotaRepublican
Baldwin, Tammy61WisconsinDemocratic
Daines, Steve61MontanaRepublican
Coons,
Christopher A.
60DelawareDemocratic
Paul, Rand60KentuckyRepublican
Kelly, Mark59ArizonaDemocratic
Cortez Masto,
Catherine
59NevadaDemocratic
Ricketts, Pete59NebraskaRepublican
Bennet, Michael F.58ColoradoDemocratic
Sullivan, Dan58AlaskaRepublican
Scott, Tim58South CarolinaRepublican
Gillibrand, Kirsten E.56New YorkDemocratic
Duckworth, Tammy55IllinoisDemocratic
Lankford, James55OklahomaRepublican
Warnock,
Raphael G.
54GeorgiaDemocratic
Booker, Cory A.54New JerseyDemocratic
Fetterman, John54PennsylvaniaDemocratic
Ernst, Joni53IowaRepublican
Rubio, Marco52FloridaRepublican
Cruz, Ted52TexasRepublican
Lee, Mike52UtahRepublican
Heinrich, Martin51New MexicoDemocratic
Luján, Ben Ray51New MexicoDemocratic
Young, Todd51IndianaRepublican
Budd, Ted51North CarolinaRepublican
Padilla, Alex50CaliforniaDemocratic
Murphy, Christopher50ConnecticutDemocratic
Schatz, Brian50HawaiiDemocratic
Schmitt, Eric48MissouriRepublican
Sinema, Kyrsten47ArizonaIndependent
Cotton, Tom46ArkansasRepublican
Mullin, Markwayne46OklahomaRepublican
Laphonza Butler44CaliforniaDemocratic
Hawley, Josh43MissouriRepublican
Britt, Katie Boyd41AlabamaRepublican
Vance, J.D.39OhioRepublican
Ossoff, Jon36GeorgiaDemocratic

On the other end of the spectrum are nine senators under the age of 50, including Democrat Jon Ossoff of Georgia, at 36, and Republican senator J.D. Vance of Ohio, at 39. Laphonza Butler, 44, the newly appointed senator to replace Feinstein, also falls within this camp.

This trend of an older Senate may have policy ramifications.

Studies show that lawmakers’ identities can influence legislative behavior. Older members of Congress have been shown to have a higher likelihood of introducing legislation on prescription drugs and long-term care, and other issues affecting seniors.

Other studies show that racial minorities, women, and veterans are more likely to intervene in Congress in the interest of these groups.

Top U.S. Senators, by Time in Office

Along with the trend of an older Congress, the average number of years served has also increased.

Today, senators in the 118th Congress have served 11.2 years on average as of January 2023. Over the 20th century, turnover has decreased due to more senators seeking re-election, which stands in contrast to the Senate’s early history when turnover happened more frequently.

Below, we show the currently serving senators that have held office the longest, based on their time in both the Senate and the House:

NameStatePartyNumber of Years in Office
Grassley, ChuckIowaRepublican48 years
Markey, EdMassachusettsDemocrat46 years
Wyden, RonOregonDemocrat42 years
Schumer, Charles E.New YorkDemocrat42 years
McConnell, MitchKentuckyRepublican38 years

Together, the top five U.S. senators have served a combined 216 years in office.

Click for Comments

Economy

The Bloc Effect: International Trade with Geopolitical Allies on the Rise

Rising geopolitical tensions are shaping the future of international trade, but what is the effect on trading among G7 and BRICS countries?

Published

on

Map showing the change in the share of a country’s exports going to their own trading blocs from 2018 to 2023.

Published

on

The following content is sponsored by The Hinrich Foundation

The Bloc Effect: International Trade with Allies on the Rise

International trade has become increasingly fragmented over the last five years as countries have shifted to trading more with their geopolitical allies.

This graphic from The Hinrich Foundation, the first in a three-part series covering the future of trade, provides visual context to the growing divide in trade in G7 and pre-expansion BRICS countries, which are used as proxies for geopolitical blocs.  

Trade Shifts in G7 and BRICS Countries

This analysis uses IMF data to examine differences in shares of exports within and between trading blocs from 2018 to 2023. For example, we looked at the percentage of China’s exports with other BRICS members as well as with G7 members to see how these proportions shifted in percentage points (pp) over time.

Countries traded nearly $270 billion more with allies in 2023 compared to 2018. This shift came at the expense of trade with rival blocs, which saw a decline of $314 billion.

CountryChange in Exports Within Bloc (pp)Change in Exports With Other Bloc (pp)
🇮🇳 India0.03.9
🇷🇺 Russia0.7-3.8
🇮🇹 Italy0.8-0.7
🇨🇦 Canada0.9-0.7
🇫🇷 France1.0-1.1
🇪🇺 EU1.1-1.5
🇩🇪 Germany1.4-2.1
🇿🇦 South Africa1.51.5
🇺🇸 U.S.1.6-0.4
🇯🇵 Japan2.0-1.7
🇨🇳 China2.1-5.2
🇧🇷 Brazil3.7-3.3
🇬🇧 UK10.20.5

All shifts reported are in percentage points. For example, the EU saw its share of exports to G7 countries rise from 74.3% in 2018 to 75.4% in 2023, which equates to a 1.1 percentage point increase. 

The UK saw the largest uptick in trading with other countries within the G7 (+10.2 percentage points), namely the EU, as the post-Brexit trade slump to the region recovered. 

Meanwhile, the U.S.-China trade dispute caused China’s share of exports to the G7 to fall by 5.2 percentage points from 2018 to 2023, the largest decline in our sample set. In fact, partly as a result of the conflict, the U.S. has by far the highest number of harmful tariffs in place. 

The Russia-Ukraine War and ensuing sanctions by the West contributed to Russia’s share of exports to the G7 falling by 3.8 percentage points over the same timeframe.  

India, South Africa, and the UK bucked the trend and continued to witness advances in exports with the opposing bloc. 

Average Trade Shifts of G7 and BRICS Blocs

Though results varied significantly on a country-by-country basis, the broader trend towards favoring geopolitical allies in international trade is clear.

BlocChange in Exports Within Bloc (pp)Change in Exports With Other Bloc (pp)
Average2.1-1.1
BRICS1.6-1.4
G7 incl. EU2.4-1.0

Overall, BRICS countries saw a larger shift away from exports with the other bloc, while for G7 countries the shift within their own bloc was more pronounced. This implies that though BRICS countries are trading less with the G7, they are relying more on trade partners outside their bloc to make up for the lost G7 share. 

A Global Shift in International Trade and Geopolitical Proximity

The movement towards strengthening trade relations based on geopolitical proximity is a global trend. 

The United Nations categorizes countries along a scale of geopolitical proximity based on UN voting records.

According to the organization’s analysis, international trade between geopolitically close countries rose from the first quarter of 2022 (when Russia first invaded Ukraine) to the third quarter of 2023 by over 6%. Conversely, trade with geopolitically distant countries declined.  

The second piece in this series will explore China’s gradual move away from using the U.S. dollar in trade settlements.

Visual Capitalist Logo

Visit the Hinrich Foundation to learn more about the future of geopolitical trade

Click for Comments

You may also like

Voronoi, the app by Visual Capitalist. Where data tells the story. Download on App Store or Google Play

Subscribe

Continue Reading
Voronoi, the app by Visual Capitalist. Where data tells the story. Download on App Store or Google Play

Subscribe

Popular